Small business▲+4Since September 2026: 10% → 13%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
13%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 4 → 3 of 69
1 category · RankedPingboard
97Judge labels
10First choices
16Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
11% in Org charts for small business buyers
Rank 4 of 95 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
4 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 8% of its 36 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Pingboard →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business4 of 72
11%34 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market4 of 95
8%36 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise17 of 86
0%27 labels
criticized challenger
In org charts · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Pingboard for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Org charts and org design | Workforce planning and analytics | 8% | 4 of 95 | 8% | 36 | accepted challenger | ▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Pingboard held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Org charts · by segment
Mid-market▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 7 → 4 of 90
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 23 → 15 of 80
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Org charts | 4% | 7% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 4 of 95 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Pingboard across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Pingboard across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct18 labels7
Paraphrase9 labels1
Comparative29 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained8 labelsNone
Scale-constrained16 labels2
Negative17 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative97 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 14 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Pingboard is frequently picked for growing and mid-size orgs that need governable org-chart changes with admin workflows and integrations.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Org charts · direct prompt · first choice
“Go with Pingboard if you want the best balance of automation, employee experience, and reasonable pricing” Kimi K2 · Org charts · direct prompt · first choice
“Pingboard (often rated best overall for mid-market)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Org charts · direct prompt · first choice
“OrgChartHub and Pingboard are top choices” Mistral Small · Org charts · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid per-employee pricing models (like ChartHop or Pingboard) if you're budget-constrained” Kimi K2 · Org charts · budget prompt · hard negative
“Clunky org chart interface — users describe it as "a little hairy" with multiple team members” Kimi K2 · Org charts · negative prompt · soft negative
“Be cautious about: Pingboard (and similar mid-tier tools with manual quirks)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Org charts · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Pingboard, over the 97 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pingboard was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Pingboard, over the 97 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pingboard was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Pingboard. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 90 of the 97 answers that named Pingboard and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
firsthr.app43
gitnux.org41
onedirectory.com41
forbes.com40
theorgchart.com35
teamohana.com34
theorg.com33
orgchartstudio.com32
venngage.com31
creately.com30
360 of the 360 domain citations in answers naming Pingboard came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
pingboard.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Pingboard takes 8% of first choices and ChartHop takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
pingboard.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Pingboard takes 8% of first choices and ChartHop takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “org chart tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “org chart software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,400 a month (“pingboard”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 2 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 265 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 9 · 2 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,079
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
8%
rank 4 of 95 in org charts
Segment leader
30%
ChartHop
- First choices
- 10 across its categories
- Named in
- 97 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 90 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on pingboard.com
979
subdomains included
Content
608
counted in the table below
Documentation
7
Product · Integration
0 · 5
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 395 | 1 | 2026-07-21 | Performance management, Employee onboarding | |
| Template or tool | 62 | 0 | 2025-09-18 | Employee onboarding, Performance management | |
| Case study | 42 | undated | Performance management, Compensation management | ||
| Conference or event | 29 | 0 | 2025-06-26 | Performance management | |
| Glossary or explainer | 28 | 0 | 2026-03-17 | Performance management, Compensation management | |
| Report or ebook | 26 | 0 | 2026-03-01 | Performance management, Employee engagement surv | |
| Comparison | 17 | 0 | 2025-10-03 | ||
| Podcast or video | 6 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | 0 | 2025-02-05 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-07-21Employee recognition messages examples blog
- 2026-04-03Remote employee engagement blog
- 2026-03-17What is compensation survey glossary or explainer
- 2026-03-17What is flexible compensation glossary or explainer
- 2026-03-01Meeting framework report or ebook
- 2026-02-23Compensation can be your biggest cost and asset report or ebook
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page pingboard.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name performance management (29); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Pingboard
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Pingboard; a claim can dispute any of them.
Pingboard (Workleap) 5Workleap Pingboard 4Pingboard (now Workleap Pingboard) 1Pingboard (now Workleap) 1Pingboard (now part of Workleap) 1
Follow Pingboard
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Pingboard is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Pingboard is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- a cloud-based org chart and employee directory solution
- For
- organizations with hybrid, remote, or distributed teams
- Integrations claimed
- 100 pingboard.com
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, certifications, hosting, customers
What Pingboard's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: pingboard.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Pingboard's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Pingboard, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Pingboard by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Pingboard is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Pingboard, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.