Small business▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 8 → 21 of 83
MyHub · 1 category · Named, not rankedMyHub Intranet
10Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. MyHub Intranet was named 4 times in Internal communications, where Microsoft Teams led with 14%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business22 of 87
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market27 of 86
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In internal communications · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named MyHub Intranet for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal communications and intranet | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 27 of 86 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Teams at 14% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, MyHub Intranet held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Internal communications · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 14 → 29 of 83
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal communications | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 27 of 86 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated MyHub Intranet across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated MyHub Intranet across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“a good fit for small businesses and lean internal comms teams focused on lower long-term costs” Perplexity Sonar · Internal communications · budget prompt · alternative
“Interact or MyHub are excellent alternatives, depending on your budget” Mistral Small · Internal communications · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as MyHub Intranet, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MyHub Intranet was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as MyHub Intranet, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MyHub Intranet was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MyHub Intranet. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named MyHub Intranet and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com8
softr.io8
firsthr.app7
oak.com6
usewhale.io6
guideflow.com5
learn.g2.com5
mangoapps.com5
simpplr.com5
workvivo.com5
Sixty of the sixty domain citations in answers naming MyHub Intranet came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
myhubintranet.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, MyHub Intranet takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Teams takes 14%.ShowHide
Search and answers
myhubintranet.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, MyHub Intranet takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Teams takes 14%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “employee intranet”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “intranet platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 50 a month (“myhub intranet”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its company's site
- myhubintranet.com shared with MyHub's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 5,051 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,194 · 19 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,216
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 27 of 86 in internal communications
Segment leader
14%
Microsoft Teams
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 10 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 10 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as MyHub Intranet
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as MyHub Intranet; a claim can dispute any of them.
MyHub 4
Follow MyHub Intranet
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
MyHub is the company behind MyHub Intranet.ShowHide
The company
MyHub is the company behind MyHub Intranet.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- a cloud-based intranet and learning management platform that helps organisations centralise communication, share knowledge, and deliver online learning to employees.
- For
- organisations
- Price stated
- We’ve also made it affordable. Check out our pricing plans here. myhubintranet.com/why-myhub
- Free plan or trial
- Free Trial myhubintranet.com/why-myhub
- Hosting
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, certifications, customers
What MyHub Intranet's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: myhubintranet.com/why-myhub, help.myhubintranet.com/what-internet-browsers-will-myhub-work-on, help.myhubintranet.com/myhub-safeguards-your-intranet-with-enterprise-level-security-. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MyHub Intranet's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MyHub Intranet, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for MyHub Intranet by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where MyHub Intranet is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name MyHub Intranet, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.