Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 74 of 132, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedMindtickle
10Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Mindtickle was named 3 times in Coaching platforms and 1 other category, where Growthspace led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business80 of 144
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market48 of 128
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise17 of 55
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In coaching platforms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Mindtickle for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coaching platforms | Learning and development | 0% | 48 of 128 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 20% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Learning experience platforms | Learning and development | 0% | 53 of 89 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by 360Learning at 26% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Mindtickle held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Coaching platforms · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 53 → 77 of 117
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 6 → 18 of 50
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coaching platforms | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 53 → 48 of 128 |
| Learning experience plat | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 53 of 89, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Mindtickle across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Mindtickle across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Mindtickle if you also need structured sales training, readiness, and practice” GPT-6 Luna · Coaching platforms · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Mindtickle, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mindtickle was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Mindtickle, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mindtickle was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mindtickle. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 10 answers that named Mindtickle and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
alpharun.com5
boon-health.com3
docebo.com3
easygenerator.com3
hyperbound.ai3
360learning.com2
g2.com2
hr-ai-index.com2
peoplemanagingpeople.com2
pipeline.zoominfo.com2
Twenty-seven of the twenty-seven domain citations in answers naming Mindtickle came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
mindtickle.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mindtickle takes 0% of first choices and Growthspace takes 20%.ShowHide
Search and answers
mindtickle.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mindtickle takes 0% of first choices and Growthspace takes 20%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “coaching platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “employee coaching platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,900 a month (“mindtickle”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 60 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 4,413 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,674 · 90 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,720
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 48 of 128 in coaching platforms
Segment leader
20%
Growthspace
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 10 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 8 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on mindtickle.com
830
subdomains included
Content
697
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
32 · 1
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 471 | 35 | 2026-09-29 | Employee onboarding, Learning management syst | |
| News or press | 65 | undated | Employee engagement surv | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 48 | 29 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Case study | 33 | 23 | 2026-07-10 | ||
| Comparison | 27 | 14 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 26 | 5 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Podcast or video | 15 | 0 | 2026-06-30 | ||
| Conference or event | 8 | 0 | 2026-06-30 | ||
| Report or ebook | 3 | 1 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2026-06-12 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29A new dawn for revenue enablement debuts at elevate26 blog
- 2026-09-28Ai coach blog
- 2026-09-28What are ai agents in revenue enablement why they matter blog
- 2026-09-28Best hyperbound competitors and alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-28Ai role play scenarios for technology sales reps blog
- 2026-09-28The future of sales ai guided selling explained blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page mindtickle.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Mindtickle
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Mindtickle is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Mindtickle is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The Mindtickle Revenue Enablement Platform is a solution for your entire sales team to elevate team performance, achieve more sales quotas, and drive revenue
- For
- customer-facing teams
- Price stated
- Pricing depends on company size and team structure. Request a demo for a detailed breakdown. mindtickle.com/platform
- Starting price
- 0 mindtickle.com/platform/integrations
- Free plan or trial
- Try it FREE now mindtickle.com/platform
- Integrations claimed
- 100 mindtickle.com/platform
- Certifications
- ISO 27001:2022SOC 2SOC 3VAPTISO 27701:2019GDPRCCPAUK DPA
- Hosting
- United Stat...IrelandSwedenSingapore
- Customers named
- CiscoJanssen IndiaIntegrace healthMetricStreamSignifydUniphoreJuniper NetworksRadNet
What Mindtickle's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: mindtickle.com, trust.mindtickle.com, mindtickle.com/platform, mindtickle.com/customer-stories, mindtickle.com/platform/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mindtickle's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mindtickle, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Mindtickle by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Mindtickle is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Mindtickle, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.