| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coaching platforms | Learning and development | 4% | 8 of 128 | 30% | 40 | criticized challenger | ▼−3Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Mentoring software | Learning and development | 0% | 22 of 77 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Together at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coaching platforms | 6% | 2% | ▼−3Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 8 of 128 |
| Mentoring software | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 25 → 22 of 77 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I would recommend CoachHub as the strongest default choice for a digital coaching marketplace” Perplexity Sonar · Coaching platforms · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Large organization (1000+ employees) → BetterUp or CoachHub” Kimi K2 · Coaching platforms · comparative prompt · first choice
“CoachHub is the conventional mid-market choice” Muse Glimmer 30B · Coaching platforms · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you have global operations (especially in Europe) and need enterprise-grade scale, consider CoachHub.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Coaching platforms · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“CoachHub - Employee concerns include: - Low salaries and pay transparency issues - Leadership concerns and "gaslighting" in business reviews” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Coaching platforms · negative prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise platforms to avoid (for tight budgets): BetterUp, CoachHub, Torch, and EZRA” MiniMax M2.5 · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid These (Due to Cost)... Enterprise-focused with volume pricing and high minimums.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · hard negative
“avoid pricier ones like BetterUp or CoachHub at $300+/user/year” Grok 4.1 Fast · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 148 of the 151 answers that named CoachHub and are not a share of its labels.
507 of the 507 domain citations in answers naming CoachHub came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 742 | 0 | 2026-05-15 | Employee onboarding, Performance management | |
| News or press | 74 | undated | |||
| Case study | 69 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 20 | 0 | 2025-03-04 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 14 | 0 | 2025-05-12 | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | 0 | 2020-09-09 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | undated |
Every page coachhub.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What CoachHub's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: coachhub.com, coachhub.com/platform-privacy-policy, coachhub.com/resources/case-studies, coachhub.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CoachHub's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CoachHub, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CoachHub by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: