Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 35 → 105 of 132
1 category · Named, not rankedGong
17Judge labels
1First choices
4Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Gong was named 6 times in Coaching platforms, where Growthspace led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business112 of 144
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market33 of 128
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise9 of 55
2%5 labels
under the label threshold
In coaching platforms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Gong for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coaching platforms | Learning and development | 0% | 33 of 128 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 20% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Gong held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Coaching platforms · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 37 of 117, unchanged
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 18 → 9 of 50
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coaching platforms | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 33 of 128, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Gong across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Gong across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct12 labels1
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“best for enterprise revenue teams seeking a comprehensive revenue intelligence platform that includes coaching features” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Coaching platforms · comparative prompt · alternative
“best for enterprise and mid-market teams needing deep call analytics to inform coaching strategy” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Coaching platforms · direct prompt · alternative
“evaluate Gong for coaching from recorded customer conversations” GPT-6 Luna · Coaching platforms · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“it is notoriously expensive, complex to set up, and often carries feature bloat that mid-market teams don't need” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Coaching platforms · direct prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Gong, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Gong was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Gong, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Gong was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Gong. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 17 answers that named Gong and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
boon-health.com7
alpharun.com5
peoplemanagingpeople.com5
easygenerator.com4
g2.com4
hyperbound.ai4
torch.io4
360learning.com3
lakgroup.com3
togetherplatform.com3
Forty-two of the forty-two domain citations in answers naming Gong came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
gong.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Gong takes 0% of first choices and Growthspace takes 20%.ShowHide
Search and answers
gong.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Gong takes 0% of first choices and Growthspace takes 20%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “coaching platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “employee coaching platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 74,000 a month (“gong”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 13,361 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 52,787 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,950 · 483 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 9,703
- Paid Google search
- 10 searches its ads show for, about 67 clicks and $1,556 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 33 of 128 in coaching platforms
Segment leader
20%
Growthspace
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 17 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 15 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on gong.io
2,138
subdomains included
Content
1,757
counted in the table below
Documentation
5
Product · Integration
116 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 638 | 12 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 500 | 0 | 2023-10-27 | ||
| Report or ebook | 173 | undated | |||
| News or press | 153 | 1 | 2026-07-01 | ||
| Case study | 138 | 0 | 2018-08-16 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 98 | 9 | 2026-10-22 | ||
| Template or tool | 38 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 11 | 0 | 2026-02-13 | ||
| Comparison | 7 | 1 | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2019-11-13 |
Most recent
- 2026-10-22The new sdr edge when everyone s outbound sounds the same your coaching is what s left webinar or virtual event
- 2026-10-06Live product tour of gong webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-17Ai prospecting needs better data blog
- 2026-09-15Ai post sales operating model blog
- 2026-09-14How Practice Operations Technology vendors should leverage AI across the revenue lifecycle blog
- 2026-09-02Live product tour of gong forecast webinar or virtual event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page gong.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Gong
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Gong; a claim can dispute any of them.
Gong.io 1Gong/Chorus 1
Follow Gong
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Gong is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Gong is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- #1 AI OS for Revenue Teams
- For
- entire GTM organization
- Price stated
- Gong’s pricing model depends on a few factors specific to your team. Licenses are priced per user. There is a platform fee based on the number of users supported. You can integrate your existing tech stack for free. gong.io/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 300 gong.io/platform
- Certifications
- CSA STARCSA STAR Level 1EU-US DPFISO/IEC 27001ISO/IEC 27017:2015ISO/IEC 27018:2019ISO/IEC 27701ISO/IEC 42001:2023
- Customers named
- AnthropicADPHubSpotLinkedInUber for BusinessSprout SocialSurveyMonkeyFrontline Education
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What Gong's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: gong.io, gong.io/pricing, trust.gong.io, gong.io/platform, gong.io/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Gong's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Gong, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Gong by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Gong is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Gong, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.