Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 90 of 94, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedMailchimp
5Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Mailchimp was named 1 time in Recruitment marketing, where Teamtailor led with 23%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market99 of 104
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise66 of 78
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In recruitment marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Mailchimp for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 0% | 99 of 104 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 23% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Mailchimp held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Recruitment marketing · by segment
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 62 of 73, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruitment marketing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 99 of 104, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Mailchimp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Mailchimp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Do not try to bolt general marketing software (like HubSpot or Mailchimp) onto a separate, basic ATS” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Mailchimp, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mailchimp was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Mailchimp, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mailchimp was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mailchimp. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Mailchimp and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
business.reddit.com2
hrtechsaas.com2
knock.app2
learn.g2.com2
mokahr.io2
nextiva.com2
peoplemanagingpeople.com2
recruiterflow.com2
reddit.com2
selectsoftwarereviews.com2
Twenty of the twenty domain citations in answers naming Mailchimp came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
mailchimp.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mailchimp takes 0% of first choices and Teamtailor takes 23%.ShowHide
Search and answers
mailchimp.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mailchimp takes 0% of first choices and Teamtailor takes 23%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “recruitment marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “recruitment marketing platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 368,000 a month (“mailchimp”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 6,862 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,931,402 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 107,032 · 9,488 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 479,356
- Paid Google search
- 5 searches its ads show for, about 29 clicks and $1,214 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 99 of 104 in recruitment marketing
Segment leader
23%
Teamtailor
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 5 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 5 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on mailchimp.com
5,551
subdomains included
Content
3,116
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,272
Product · Integration
81 · 336
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 2,603 | 0 | 2026-05-27 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 122 | 1 | 2026-08-24 | ||
| News or press | 99 | 0 | 2026-06-17 | ||
| Comparison | 91 | 1 | 2026-08-24 | ||
| Case study | 78 | 0 | 2025-03-21 | ||
| Report or ebook | 63 | 0 | 2020-07-06 | ||
| Template or tool | 29 | 0 | 2017-11-02 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 21 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 6 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 4 | 0 | 2016-09-20 |
Most recent
- 2026-08-24What is the best way to ask for product reviews via email glossary or explainer
- 2026-08-24Whatsapp vs sms comparison
- 2026-06-17Mailchimp native b2b support shopify merchants news or press
- 2026-05-27Business owners ai survey blog
- 2026-04-10Short code vs long code sms comparison
- 2026-04-10Create a successful promotional strategy blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page mailchimp.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Mailchimp
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Mailchimp is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Mailchimp is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Marketing plans that grow with you
- Price stated
- Free for 14 days; then, starts at $20/month mailchimp.com/pricing/marketing
- Starting price
- 20 mailchimp.com/pricing/marketing
- Free plan or trial
- Under 250 contacts? It's free. Free for 14 days. mailchimp.com/pricing/marketing
- Integrations claimed
- 300 mailchimp.com/pricing/marketing
- Certifications
- Visa Cardholder Information Security and Compliance (CISP)MasterCard® Site Data Protection Program (SDP)Discovery Information Security and Compliance (DISC)SOC 2ISO 27001VPAT®EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (EU-U.S. DPF)UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF
- Hosting
- United States
- Customers named
- Stash Hotel RewardsHC BrandsThe Breakthrough Coach
What Mailchimp's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: mailchimp.com, mailchimp.com/pricing/marketing, mailchimp.com/about/security, mailchimp.com/features, mailchimp.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mailchimp's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mailchimp, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Mailchimp by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Mailchimp is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Mailchimp, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.