Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 of 99, unchanged
Legion · 2 categories · Named, not rankedLegion WFM
15Judge labels
2First choices
2Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Legion WFM was named 4 times in Workforce scheduling and 1 other category, where Deputy led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market12 of 108
2%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise12 of 135
2%4 labels
under the label threshold
In workforce scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Legion WFM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce scheduling | Core HR and payroll | 2% | 12 of 108 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 37% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
| Workforce management suites | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 43 of 78 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 17% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Legion WFM held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Workforce scheduling · by segment
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 44 → 13 of 122
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce scheduling | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 12 of 108, unchanged |
| Workforce management sui | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 22 → 43 of 78 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Legion WFM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Legion WFM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labels1
Negative4 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Legion, UKG Dimensions, Dayforce, and Deputy are the top recommendations” Mistral Small · Workforce scheduling · direct prompt · first choice
“unless your workforce is mostly hourly/frontline, in which case Legion may be a better fit” GPT-5.4 mini · Workforce management sui · direct prompt · alternative
“Worth including when optimized scheduling is the main problem” GPT-6 Luna · Workforce management sui · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“make implementation a major part of your reference checks... a customer report of disorganized project management and delays” GPT-6 Luna · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Legion WFM, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Legion WFM was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Legion WFM, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Legion WFM was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Legion WFM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named Legion WFM and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
legion.coYour site7
ukg.com6
workday.com6
dayforce.com5
g2.com5
gartner.com4
mangoapps.com3
myshyft.com3
paycor.com3
quinyx.com3
Thirty-eight of the forty-five domain citations in answers naming Legion WFM came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
legion.co is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Legion WFM takes 2% of first choices and Deputy takes 37%.ShowHide
Search and answers
legion.co is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Legion WFM takes 2% of first choices and Deputy takes 37%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “scheduling tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “employee scheduling software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 210 a month (“legion wfm”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 11 a month
- Its company's site
- legion.co shared with Legion's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 110,586 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,071 · 206 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 989
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 12 of 108 in workforce scheduling
Segment leader
37%
Deputy
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 15 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 15 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Legion WFM
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Legion WFM; a claim can dispute any of them.
Legion 3
Follow Legion WFM
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Legion is the company behind Legion WFM.ShowHide
The company
Legion is the company behind Legion WFM.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Intelligent Automation Powered by Legion WFM
- For
- leading retailers
- Customers named
- CinemarkHelzbergLuxury Retail Organization
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Legion WFM's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: pages.legion.co/legacy-wfm.html, pages.legion.co/intelligent-wfm.html, legion.co/forrester-tei-study-legion-wfm, legion.co/wfm-software-generative-ai-whitepaper, legion.co/product-tour-ai-in-legion-wfm-on-demand. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Legion WFM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Legion WFM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Legion WFM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Legion WFM is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Legion WFM, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.