Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 72 → 79 of 83
1 category · Named, not rankedJive
12Judge labels
0First choices
6Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Jive was named 5 times in Internal communications, where Microsoft Teams led with 14%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business83 of 87
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market82 of 86
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise66 of 92
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In internal communications · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Jive for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal communications and intranet | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 82 of 86 | 60% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Teams at 14% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Jive held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Internal communications · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 80 → 73 of 83
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 59 → 64 of 87
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal communications | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 80 → 82 of 86 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Jive across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Jive across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Platforms specifically built for intranets (e.g., BambooHR, Jive, Intrawaare, SharePoint Online). These handle hosting, security, and mobile access.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Internal communications · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid — old technology, poor support” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal communications · negative prompt · hard negative
“Older Jive installations: This is a version-specific warning, not a blanket judgment on Jive.” GPT-6 Luna · Internal communications · negative prompt · soft negative
“its market share has declined, and it has suffered from slow product innovation” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal communications · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Jive, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jive was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Jive, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jive was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Jive. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 12 answers that named Jive and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
workvivo.com6
joinblink.com5
agilityportal.io4
mangoapps.com4
axerosolutions.com3
blog.jostle.me3
reddit.com3
simpplr.com3
staffbase.com3
clearbox.co.uk2
Thirty-six of the thirty-six domain citations in answers naming Jive came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
jivesoftware.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Jive takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Teams takes 14%.ShowHide
Search and answers
jivesoftware.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Jive takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Teams takes 14%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “employee intranet”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “intranet platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 18,100 a month (“jive”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 3,334 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 438 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 192 · 7 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,502
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 82 of 86 in internal communications
Segment leader
14%
Microsoft Teams
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 12 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 7 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on jivesoftware.com
2,710
subdomains included
Content
26
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,347
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conference or event | 11 | undated | |||
| News or press | 10 | undated | |||
| Blog | 2 | 0 | 2015-06-03 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 1 | 0 | 2015-06-03 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2015-06-03A successful enterprise ux project considers the blog
- 2015-06-03Why designing for enterprise vs consumer products comparison
- 2015-06-03The wicked craft of enterprise ux blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page jivesoftware.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Jive
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Jive; a claim can dispute any of them.
Jive (now under Aurea) 1
Follow Jive
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Jive is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Jive is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Jive AI is an enterprise collaboration and community platform built for the world's most complex enterprises to connect, share, and work together.
- For
- the world's most complex enterprises
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Jive's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: jivesoftware.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Jive's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Jive, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Jive by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Jive is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Jive, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.