Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 21 → 123 of 125
Workday · 1 category · RankedWorkday Talent Marketplace
59Judge labels
2First choices
15Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Internal talent marketpl for enterprise buyers
Rank 56 of 102 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 39% of its 18 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Workday Talent Marketplace →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business127 of 129
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market56 of 102
0%18 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise4 of 86
4%33 labels
accepted challenger
In internal talent marketpl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Workday Talent Marketplace for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal talent marketplace | Performance and talent management | 0% | 56 of 102 | 39% | 18 | criticized challenger | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Workday Talent Marketplace held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Internal talent marketpl · by segment
Mid-market▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 8 → 80 of 93
Enterprise▼−6Since September 2026: 11% → 5%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 11% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 3 of 76, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal talent marketpl | 4% | 0% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 56 of 102 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Workday Talent Marketplace across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Workday Talent Marketplace across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct17 labelsNone
Paraphrase12 labelsNone
Comparative10 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained12 labels2
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative59 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Workday Talent Marketplace - Integrated with Workday HCM... enterprises use Workday for retention” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal talent marketpl · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best For: Companies already utilizing major Core HR suites (like Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, or Cornerstone).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal talent marketpl · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Organisations already on Workday HCM that want zero integration overhead.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Internal talent marketpl · comparative prompt · alternative
“best if you already run core HR on Workday and want tighter ecosystem integration” GPT-5.4 mini · Internal talent marketpl · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Workday Talent Marketplace - only available if you already use Workday” Kimi K2 · Internal talent marketpl · budget prompt · hard negative
“Steer clear of enterprise platforms (Gloat, Workday, Fuel50)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal talent marketpl · budget prompt · hard negative
“platforms (like Gloat, Eightfold AI, or Workday Talent Marketplace) were built for massive enterprises and require thousands of employees to function effectively” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal talent marketpl · scale prompt · soft negative
“their Opportunity Marketplace adds internal features—but overkill/expensive for pure mid-market standalone” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal talent marketpl · direct prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Workday Talent Marketplace, over the 59 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday Talent Marketplace was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Workday Talent Marketplace, over the 59 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday Talent Marketplace was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workday Talent Marketplace. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 56 of the 59 answers that named Workday Talent Marketplace and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
engagedly.com30
fuel50.com26
gartner.com26
peoplemanagingpeople.com19
skima.ai18
sourceforge.net18
sprad.io18
pin.com17
g2.com16
itechguides.com16
204 of the 204 domain citations in answers naming Workday Talent Marketplace came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Workday Talent Marketplace stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Workday Talent Marketplace stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 40 a month (“workday talent marketplace”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 3 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Workday's site (workday.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 56 of 102 in internal talent marketpl
Segment leader
47%
Fuel50
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 59 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 56 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Workday Talent Marketplace
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Workday Talent Marketplace; a claim can dispute any of them.
Workday 7Workday (Internal Mobility module) 1
Follow Workday Talent Marketplace
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Workday is the company behind Workday Talent Marketplace.ShowHide
The company
Workday is the company behind Workday Talent Marketplace.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Talentmarkt in Workday Talent Optimization, der Rollen auf der Grundlage ihrer Kompetenzen empfiehlt.
- For
- Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter
- Customers named
- JLL
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Workday Talent Marketplace's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: workday.com/de-de/topics/hr/talent-management.html, workday.com/de-de/pages/cb/workday-skills-cloud.html, workday.com/de-de/topics/hr/talent-management-hr.html, workday.com/en-in/topics/hr/talent-management-india.html, workday.com/ja-jp/topics/hr/talent-management-system.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workday Talent Marketplace's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workday Talent Marketplace, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Workday Talent Marketplace by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Workday Talent Marketplace is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Workday Talent Marketplace, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.