Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 39 of 77, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedHRBench
6Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. HRBench was named 3 times in People analytics, where Crunchr led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business40 of 81
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market11 of 114
2%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise35 of 79
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In people analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named HRBench for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 2% | 11 of 114 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, HRBench held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · People analytics · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 64 → 9 of 101
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 36 → 33 of 72
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People analytics | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 64 → 11 of 114 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated HRBench across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated HRBench across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase3 labels1
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“HRBench would be my top choice because it combines comprehensive analytics with built-in surveys and benchmarking in a single platform” GLM 4.7 FlashX · People analytics · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For companies with more complex analytics needs and a larger headcount, HRBench is worth considering.” Mistral Small · People analytics · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“### 4. HRBench - Best for: Mid-size companies (500-5,000 employees)” MiniMax M2.5 · People analytics · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HRBench, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HRBench was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HRBench, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HRBench was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HRBench. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named HRBench and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
hrbench.comYour site6
hibob.com5
hr.software3
ordio.com3
workhuman.com3
hr.university2
paycor.com2
peoplemanagingpeople.com2
thoughtspot.com2
airmason.com1
Twenty-three of the twenty-nine domain citations in answers naming HRBench came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on hrbench.com
216
subdomains included
Content
112
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
30 · 27
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 57 | 5 | 2026-08-28 | People analytics, Workforce planning | |
| Blog | 28 | 6 | 2026-09-16 | People analytics, Workforce planning | |
| Comparison | 9 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 8 | undated | HRIS and HCM platforms | ||
| Template or tool | 5 | undated | People analytics | ||
| Case study | 3 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 1 | 1 | 2026-09-16 | People analytics | |
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-16Boston people analytics meetup 2026 conference or event
- 2026-09-16People analytics software no analyst blog
- 2026-09-11Best people analytics software private equity blog
- 2026-08-31Best hr dashboard software blog
- 2026-08-28Human capital due diligence glossary or explainer
- 2026-08-27Best people analytics software blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page hrbench.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow HRBench
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
HRBench is its own company.ShowHide
The company
HRBench is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- People Intelligence Platform
- For
- mid-market and PE-backed companies with 500 to 5000 employees
- Price stated
- Schedule a free 20-minute demo with a custom benchmark report built from your data hrbench.com
- Starting price
- 0 hrbench.com
- Free plan or trial
- Schedule a free 20-minute demo hrbench.com
- Integrations claimed
- 104 hrbench.com
- Certifications
- GDPR compliantSOC 2SOC 2 Type II - 2025SOC 2 Type II - 2024SOC 2 Type I - 2024
- Hosting
- US
- Customers named
- Kimray, Inc.Community Medical ServicesFirstKey Homes
What HRBench's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: hrbench.com, hrbench.com, hrbench.com/pricing, trust.hrbench.com, hrbench.com/product/release. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HRBench's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HRBench, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for HRBench by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where HRBench is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name HRBench, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.