AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Guidepoint · October 2026 Edition
3 categories · Named, not ranked

Guidepoint

12Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
1 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Guidepoint was named 3 times in Flexible benefits and 2 other categories, where Compt led with 40%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In flexible benefits · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Guidepoint for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Flexible benefits and lifestyle spending accountsCompensation and total rewards0%60 of 900%1under 10 labels · led by Compt at 40%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
HRIS and HCM platformsCore HR and payroll0%40 of 660%1under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 26%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
PEO providersCore HR and payroll0%30 of 530%1under 10 labels · led by Justworks at 24%

Movement

Since September 2026, Guidepoint held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Flexible benefits · by segment

Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 53 of 80, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Flexible benefits0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 60 of 90, unchanged
HRIS and HCM platforms0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 40 of 66, unchanged
PEOs0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 30 of 53, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Guidepoint across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500303
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase7 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Guidepoint, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Guidepoint was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
BambooHR7 of 121Not among the top eight
Rippling4 of 120Not among the top eight
15Five2 of 121Not among the top eight
ADP TotalSource2 of 120Not among the top eight
ADP Workforce Now2 of 120Not among the top eight
Google Forms + Sheets2 of 120Not among the top eight
Insperity2 of 120Not among the top eight
Paychex Flex2 of 120Not among the top eight
Workable2 of 120Not among the top eight
Clockify1 of 121Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on guide.co
221
subdomains included
Content
25
counted in the table below
Documentation
164
Product · Integration
4 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog17undatedInterview scheduling
Case study5undated
Conference or event102025-10-26
Report or ebook102025-07-25Applicant tracking syste
Comparison1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page guide.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Guidepoint

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Guidepoint is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI-powered interview scheduling platform that automates recruiting coordination with human-level candidate experience and accuracy
For
TA teams
Price stated
Pricing for the Guide platform is based on a few factors about your company, including company size, hiring volume and the desired feature package. guide.co/pricing-3
Integrations claimed
6 guide.co
Certifications
SOC 2 Audited & CertifiedGDPR & CCPA Compliant
Customers named
GlossierDuolingoGitlabNetlifyMongoDBMURALNexHealthCallRail
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, hosting

What Guidepoint's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: guide.co, guide.co/pricing-3, guide.co/security, guide.co/product/surveys, guide.co/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Guidepoint's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Guidepoint, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Guidepoint by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Guidepoint is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Guidepoint, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at guide.co is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.