Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 5% → 7%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 4 → 6 of 50
3 categories · RankedTogether
168Judge labels
31First choices
33Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
28% in Mentoring software for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 77 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
6 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 4% of its 46 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Together →By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
Small business6 of 54
6%44 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market1 of 77
28%46 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise3 of 44
18%62 labels
accepted challenger
In mentoring software · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Together for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mentoring software | Learning and development | 28% | 1 of 77 | 4% | 46 | accepted challenger | ▼−10Since September 2026: 37% → 27%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Coaching platforms | Learning and development | 4% | 9 of 128 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 20% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 0% | 59 of 93 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 28% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Together held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Mentoring software · by segment
Mid-market▼−10Since September 2026: 37% → 27%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
27%from 37% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 3 pointsRank 1 of 74, unchanged
Enterprise▼−9Since September 2026: 27% → 18%, −9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
18%from 27% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 3 of 43, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mentoring software | 37% | 27% | ▼−10Since September 2026: 37% → 27%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 77, unchanged |
| Coaching platforms | 0% | 4% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 29 → 9 of 128 |
| Succession planning | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 59 of 93, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Together across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Together across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct34 labels11
Paraphrase30 labels9
Comparative36 labels6not counted in share
Budget-constrained31 labels10
Scale-constrained20 labels1
Negative17 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative168 labels in all, every segment counted; 31 of the 38 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For the best balance of affordability and features, Together (starting at $6/user/month) and Exec (starting at $20/user/month) are the most budget-friendly options” Mistral Small · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · first choice
“I want to run an internal program for my company. | Together or MentorcliQ | Strong integrations, automated matching, and robust executive reporting.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Mentoring software · comparative prompt · first choice
“Together Platform: Widely considered one of the best for user experience (UX) and ease of use... making it incredibly easy to launch with minimal admin hours.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Mentoring software · scale prompt · first choice
“Together and Guider are frequently highlighted as top choices because they are easy to set up” Mistral Small · Mentoring software · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“What to Avoid on a Tight Budget ... Together Platform: Starts at ~$10,000–$12,000/year” Kimi K2 · Mentoring software · budget prompt · hard negative
“Major enterprise players like Together, Chronus, and MentorcliQ typically start at $10,000+ per year” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Mentoring software · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Together, over the 168 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Together was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Together, over the 168 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Together was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Together. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 163 of the 168 answers that named Together and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
qooper.io102
togetherplatform.comYour site82
chronus.com72
growthmentor.com70
mentorcliq.com70
g2.com67
guideflow.com65
peoplemanagingpeople.com59
mentorcity.com41
softwareadvice.com41
587 of the 669 domain citations in answers naming Together came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Together stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Together stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “mentoring platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “mentoring program software”
3
- Searches for its name, Google
- 165,000 a month (“together”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1,119,610 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 37,952 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 12,029 · 704 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,929
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
28%
rank 1 of 77 in mentoring software
First choices
31
across its categories
- Named in
- 168 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 163 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on togetherplatform.com
1,382
subdomains included
Content
961
counted in the table below
Documentation
197
Product · Integration
8 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 650 | 10 | 2026-08-10 | Succession planning, Performance management | |
| Case study | 140 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 100 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 25 | 1 | 2026-08-10 | Mentoring software, Succession planning | |
| Template or tool | 14 | 3 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Comparison | 13 | 1 | 2026-08-10 | Performance management | |
| Conference or event | 11 | 0 | 2023-05-02 | ||
| Report or ebook | 6 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2021-11-07 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-1015877737 2 registration checklist template or tool
- 2026-09-1015877965 together checklist steps to launch template or tool
- 2026-09-0915877898 tasks checklists admin template or tool
- 2026-08-109 box talent review blog
- 2026-08-10Best chronus alternatives comparison
- 2026-08-10Best training and development programs blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page togetherplatform.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Together
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Together; a claim can dispute any of them.
Together Platform 11Together Mentoring 4Together Software 3Together (now part of Absorb LMS) 1Together Mentorship 1
Follow Together
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Together is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Together is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Streamline employee development with automated mentorship software.
- For
- organizations
- Price stated
- Results focused pricing model that scales with your mentorship program togetherplatform.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- free templates togetherplatform.com/use-cases/diversity
- Certifications
- SOC 2
- Customers named
- ActivisionHubspotMarquetaAvison YoungFirst HorizonThe ForumFergusonLouisiana Department of Health
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, hosting
What Together's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: togetherplatform.com, togetherplatform.com/pricing, togetherplatform.com/use-cases/diversity, togetherplatform.com/customers, togetherplatform.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Together's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Together, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Together by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Together is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Together, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Together is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Together is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideAI models recommend Together first in Mentoring software this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.