AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Empower · October 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Empower

20Judge labels
0First choices
12Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Financial wellness for mid-market buyers
Rank 51 of 117 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 29% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In financial wellness · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Empower for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Financial wellness platformsCompensation and total rewards0%51 of 11729%7under 10 labels · led by LearnLux at 24%
Earned wage accessCompensation and total rewards0%51 of 54100%4under 10 labels · led by Tapcheck at 38%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
HSA and FSA administratorsCompensation and total rewards0%32 of 1110%2under 10 labels · led by HealthEquity at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Empower yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Empower across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00022
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01012
Kimi K200022
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00112

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative12 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best For: Employers looking for a comprehensive solution covering retirement, short-term emergency funds, and debt reduction.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Financial wellness · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best For: Investors and individuals with moderate-to-high net worth” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial wellness · comparative prompt · alternative
“EMPOWER combines advanced technology with personalized service” Claude Haiku 4.5 · HSA & FSA admin · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Empower is repeatedly named alongside EarnIn and MoneyLion as a direct-to-consumer advance.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Earned wage access · negative prompt · hard negative
“solicits "numerous, uncapped fees" and uses "manipulative tactics" to coerce tips” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Earned wage access · negative prompt · hard negative
“Marketed similarly to Dave, also subject to scrutiny regarding debt cycles.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Earned wage access · negative prompt · hard negative
“"Voluntary" tips and expedite fees that most users end up paying” Kimi K2 · Financial wellness · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Empower, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Empower was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
EarnIn12 of 200Not among the top eight
DailyPay10 of 204Not among the top eight
Payactiv10 of 204Not among the top eight
MoneyLion – Instacash9 of 200Not among the top eight
Chime Workplace6 of 203Not among the top eight
Brigit6 of 200Not among the top eight
Dave6 of 200Not among the top eight
Tapcheck3 of 202Not among the top eight
Branch3 of 201Not among the top eight
Rain3 of 201Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Empower. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 20 answers that named Empower and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

empower.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Empower takes 0% of first choices and LearnLux takes 24%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “financial wellness platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “financial wellness platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
823,000 a month (“empower”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
21,818 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 2,954,551 a month
Searches its site ranks for
106,577 · 10,242 in the top three
Sites linking to it
11,655
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 12 clicks and $105 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
115+ ads · 93 video, 17 image, 5 text · 53 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2026, as Personal Capital Corporation, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 115 in the year. 5 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 51 of 117 in financial wellness
Segment leader
24%
LearnLux
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
20 answers
Its own site cited
in 19 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on empower.com
2,211
subdomains included
Content
547
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
7 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
News or press377undated
Glossary or explainer5912026-10-01
Blog38undated
Comparison2722026-10-02
Template or tool26undated
Report or ebook1512026-10-02
Webinar or virtual event2undated
Podcast or video2undated
Conference or event1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page empower.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Empower

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Empower; a claim can dispute any of them.
Empower (formerly Personal Capital) 2EMPOWER 1Empower (Personal Finance Platform) 1Empower/Tilt 1

Follow Empower

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Empower is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Our vision is to transform financial lives through advice, people and technology. Our mission is to empower financial freedom for all.
For
Personal investors; workplace retirement; employers and plan sponsors; financial professionals
Certifications
registered investment adviser with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)Member FINRA/SIPC
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting, customers

What Empower's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: empower.com, empower.com/plan-sponsors/solutions/marc-pension-administration-system. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Empower's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Empower, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Empower by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Empower is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Empower, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at empower.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.