Small business▼−7Since September 2026: 9% → 2%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 9% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 3 → 7 of 61
2 categories · RankedCoggno
33Judge labels
9First choices
2Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
14% in Compliance training for enterprise buyers
Rank 13 of 92 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business7 of 65
2%11 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market13 of 92
2%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise3 of 94
14%13 labels
accepted challenger
In compliance training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Coggno for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance training | Learning and development | 2% | 13 of 92 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Traliant at 22% | ▼−10Since September 2026: 12% → 2%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Online course libraries | Learning and development | 0% | 32 of 95 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 48% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Coggno held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Compliance training · by segment
Mid-market▼−10Since September 2026: 12% → 2%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 12% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 3 pointsRank 4 → 13 of 89
Enterprise▲+4Since September 2026: 12% → 16%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
16%from 12% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 3 → 2 of 86
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance training | 12% | 2% | ▼−10Since September 2026: 12% → 2%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 13 of 92 |
| Online course libraries | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 32 of 95, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Coggno across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Coggno across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase6 labels1
Comparative8 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained14 labels8
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative33 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best "Pay-As-You-Go" Platform: Coggno ... Choose Coggno if you want a free platform and only want to pay a few dollars per course” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Compliance training · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose Coggno if you only care about legally required compliance and HR training.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Online course libraries · budget prompt · alternative
“Best if you want a broader training marketplace/LMS approach: Coggno” Perplexity Sonar · Compliance training · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“For Broader Compliance Needs: Coggno” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Compliance training · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Coggno, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Coggno was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Coggno, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Coggno was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Coggno. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 33 of the 33 answers that named Coggno and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
coggno.comYour site33
easyllama.com13
bizlibrary.com12
firsthr.app12
knowlify.com12
navex.com11
proprofstraining.com10
trainual.com10
compliquest.com8
expertinsights.com8
Ninety-six of the 129 domain citations in answers naming Coggno came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
coggno.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Coggno takes 2% of first choices and Traliant takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
coggno.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Coggno takes 2% of first choices and Traliant takes 22%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “compliance training platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “compliance training providers”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 210 a month (“coggno”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 14,138 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 8,749 · 71 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,622
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 13 of 92 in compliance training
Segment leader
22%
Traliant
- First choices
- 9 across its categories
- Named in
- 33 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 33 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on coggno.com
10,141
subdomains included
Content
1,613
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
9 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,347 | 10 | 2026-09-28 | Compliance training, Learning management syst | |
| Comparison | 102 | 11 | 2026-09-23 | Compliance training, HRIS and HCM platforms | |
| Glossary or explainer | 79 | 2 | 2026-09-23 | Compliance training, HRIS and HCM platforms | |
| Template or tool | 30 | 3 | 2026-09-08 | Compliance training, HRIS and HCM platforms | |
| Conference or event | 27 | 1 | 2026-08-10 | Compliance training | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 14 | 0 | 2025-10-17 | ||
| Report or ebook | 9 | 0 | 2025-05-27 | ||
| Case study | 2 | 1 | 2026-08-13 | ||
| News or press | 2 | 0 | 2023-06-08 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2023-10-29 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28State implicit bias training mandates healthcare licensees ca mi md wa mn blog
- 2026-09-28State by state safe patient handling training implementation guide hospitals nursing homes blog
- 2026-09-23Navex alternatives compliance training comparison
- 2026-09-23Jj keller alternatives dot fleet training comparison
- 2026-09-23Easyllama alternatives harassment training comparison
- 2026-09-23Coggno vs litmos compliance training comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page coggno.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Coggno
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Coggno is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Coggno is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Compliance Training LMS
- For
- companies
- Price stated
- Purchase courses a la carte or subscribe to Coggno Prime from $5/user/month with full LMS access included. coggno.com
- Starting price
- $5/user/month coggno.com
- Free plan or trial
- Sign Up Free coggno.com
- Integrations claimed
- 24 coggno.com/pricing · 1 coggno.com/integrations pages disagree
- Certifications
- OSHA-Authorized OSHA 10OSHA-Authorized OSHA 30completion certificatesstate-approved or ANSI-accredited certificationsOSHA DOL cardsfood handler cards
- Customers named
- Maryland National Capital Parks and Planning Commission
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Coggno's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: coggno.com, coggno.com/pricing, coggno.com/platform, coggno.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Coggno's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Coggno, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Coggno by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Coggno is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Coggno, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.