Small business▲+6Since September 2026: 2% → 9%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 6 → 3 of 61
1 category · RankedTraliant
108Judge labels
24First choices
2Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
22% in Compliance training for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 92 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 3% of its 39 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Traliant →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business3 of 65
11%37 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market1 of 92
22%39 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise2 of 94
14%32 labels
accepted challenger
In compliance training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Traliant for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance training | Learning and development | 22% | 1 of 92 | 3% | 39 | accepted challenger | ▼−4Since September 2026: 22% → 18%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Traliant held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Compliance training · by segment
Mid-market▼−4Since September 2026: 22% → 18%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
18%from 22% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 1 of 89, unchanged
Enterprise▼−5Since September 2026: 16% → 11%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
11%from 16% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 2 → 3 of 86
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance training | 22% | 18% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 22% → 18%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 92, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Traliant across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Traliant across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct15 labels4
Paraphrase32 labels18
Comparative36 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labels1
Scale-constrained10 labels1
Negative10 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative108 labels in all, every segment counted; 24 of the 31 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Traliant is the gold standard for US harassment training content and state-specific compliance.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Compliance training · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Traliant as a strong top choice for harassment prevention training” Grok 4.1 Fast · Compliance training · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Traliant as your top choice for a mid-sized B2B company” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Compliance training · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“My recommendation: Start with a demo from Traliant if budget allows” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Compliance training · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“one commenter said "Traliant is completely worthless." ... criticism about dated videos and a clunky admin platform” Muse Glimmer 30B · Compliance training · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Traliant, over the 108 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Traliant was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Traliant, over the 108 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Traliant was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Traliant. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 108 of the 108 answers that named Traliant and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
traliant.comYour site66
coggno.com60
navex.com46
easyllama.com45
bizlibrary.com43
g2.com38
emtrain.com33
expertinsights.com32
compliquest.com31
valamis.com29
357 of the 423 domain citations in answers naming Traliant came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Traliant stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Traliant stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “compliance training platform”
6
Position for “compliance training providers”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 5,400 a month (“traliant”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 58 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 12,679 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,710 · 148 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,486
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 2 clicks and $5 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
22%
rank 1 of 92 in compliance training
First choices
24
across its categories
- Named in
- 108 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 108 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on traliant.com
2,998
subdomains included
Content
1,237
counted in the table below
Documentation
3
Product · Integration
1,340 · 57
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 889 | 5 | 2026-09-25 | Compliance training | |
| News or press | 208 | 4 | 2026-09-16 | Compliance training | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 59 | 0 | 2023-12-18 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 25 | 0 | 2026-03-24 | ||
| Case study | 22 | 1 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Report or ebook | 10 | 0 | 2023-06-29 | ||
| Conference or event | 9 | 0 | 2026-01-15 | Compliance training | |
| Podcast or video | 9 | 0 | 2023-06-20 | ||
| Comparison | 6 | 0 | 2026-03-19 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25When assumptions shape workplace decisions blog
- 2026-09-23Risk is year round learning should be too blog
- 2026-09-16Traliant unveils brand evolution news or press
- 2026-09-15Boars head customer story case study
- 2026-09-11Why harassment training requires reinforcement blog
- 2026-09-03Your managers are the first line of defense most arent ready blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page traliant.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Traliant
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Traliant is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Traliant is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Modern online compliance training solutions for organizations
- For
- organizations
- Price stated
- Essential: Starting at $13.95 per learner / annually; Pro: Starting at $21.95 per learner / annually; Complete: Starting at $30.95 per learner / annually; Plus: Starting at $3.99 per learner / annually traliant.com/pricing-2
- Starting price
- 13.95 traliant.com/pricing-2
- Free plan or trial
- Start your free trial now! traliant.com
- Integrations claimed
- 5 traliant.com
- Certifications
- WCAG 2.2 AA-certified for accessibility
- Customers named
- Grubhub
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Traliant's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: traliant.com, traliant.com/pricing-2, trust.traliant.com, traliant.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Traliant's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Traliant, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Traliant by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Traliant is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Traliant, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Traliant is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Traliant is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideAI models recommend Traliant first in Compliance training this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.