Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked
1 category · Named, not rankedBeekeeper/LumApps
2Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Beekeeper/LumApps was named 1 time in Frontline employee apps, where Connecteam led with 49%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market31 of 106
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise25 of 91
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In frontline employee apps · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Beekeeper/LumApps for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontline employee apps | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 31 of 106 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Connecteam at 49% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Beekeeper/LumApps held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Frontline employee apps · by segment
Mid-marketgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontline employee apps | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 32 → 31 of 106 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Beekeeper/LumApps across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Beekeeper/LumApps across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 label1not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Beekeeper/LumApps if frontline workflows are as important as messaging” GPT-6 Luna · Frontline employee apps · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Beekeeper/LumApps, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Beekeeper/LumApps was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Beekeeper/LumApps, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Beekeeper/LumApps was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Beekeeper/LumApps. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Beekeeper/LumApps and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
joinblink.com2
staffbase.com2
apps.apple.com1
beekeeper.ioYour site1
business.whatsapp.com1
changeengine.com1
connecteam.com1
crewcheck.io1
f6s.com1
guideflow.com1
Eleven of the twelve domain citations in answers naming Beekeeper/LumApps came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
beekeeper.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Beekeeper/LumApps takes 0% of first choices and Connecteam takes 49%.ShowHide
Search and answers
beekeeper.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Beekeeper/LumApps takes 0% of first choices and Connecteam takes 49%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “frontline apps”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “frontline employee communication app”
–
not in the top ten
- Organic visits to its site
- about 11,326 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,342 · 63 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,490
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 31 of 106 in frontline employee apps
Segment leader
49%
Connecteam
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 2 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 2 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on beekeeper.io
3,515
subdomains included
Content
1,098
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
39 · 116
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 579 | 0 | 2025-01-27 | Employee onboarding, Internal communications | |
| News or press | 176 | undated | Internal communications | ||
| Conference or event | 85 | undated | |||
| Case study | 68 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 60 | 0 | 2026-06-08 | HRIS and HCM platforms | |
| Report or ebook | 54 | undated | Internal communications | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 21 | 0 | 2023-03-22 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 20 | 1 | 2026-08-29 | Internal communications | |
| Template or tool | 19 | 0 | 2023-10-04 | Employee onboarding | |
| Podcast or video | 16 | 0 | 2023-10-24 |
Most recent
- 2026-08-29What is a feedback loop glossary or explainer
- 2026-06-08Internet vs intranet vs extranet comparison
- 2026-02-05Simpplr alternatives comparison
- 2025-09-08Lumapps vs akumina which intranet is better comparison
- 2025-06-18Fixed vs growth mindset in internal communications comparison
- 2025-06-06What is an intranet why does my company need one glossary or explainer
Events in person
Last twelve months
- April 23, 2026Panel: Don’t Fear the Tech Stack: How to Make the Right Moves That Finally Put Your Tools to Work For YouWestin Boston Seaport, Boston, United States · spoke
- April 21, 2026 to April 23, 2026Ragan Employee Communications and Culture Conference 2026Boston, United States · attended
- March 17, 2026 to March 19, 2026UNLEASH America 2026Caesars Forum, Las Vegas, United States · exhibited
As the event pages on beekeeper.io state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page beekeeper.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Beekeeper/LumApps
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Beekeeper/LumApps is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Beekeeper/LumApps is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Beekeeper's mobile-first frontline experience is now part of the LumApps AI Employee Hub, connecting your workforce from HQ to the frontline in one place.
- For
- Frontline workers, deskless workforce, corporate teams
- Integrations claimed
- 500 beekeeper.io
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, certifications, hosting, customers
What Beekeeper/LumApps's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: beekeeper.io, trust.beekeeper.io. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Beekeeper/LumApps's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Beekeeper/LumApps, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Beekeeper/LumApps by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Beekeeper/LumApps is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Beekeeper/LumApps, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.