Every category where a model named WorkRamp for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Learning management systems	Learning and development	2%	9 of 61	11%	9	under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 51%	▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Course authoring tools	Learning and development	0%	44 of 82	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Articulate 360 at 30%	▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Employee onboarding	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	54 of 87	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 25%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Online course libraries	Learning and development	0%	45 of 95	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 48%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, WorkRamp held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Learning management syst · by segment

Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked

Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

2%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 13 → 8 of 55

Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 39 → 21 of 65

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Learning management syst	0%	2%	▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 13 → 9 of 61
Course authoring tools	2%	0%	▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 18 → 44 of 82
Employee onboarding	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 54 of 87, unchanged
Online course libraries	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 64 → 45 of 95

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated WorkRamp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	3	0	0	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels1

Paraphrase9 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Why it wins for mid-market B2B: It is designed from the ground up to integrate with the tools B2B employees use daily” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning management syst · direct prompt · first choice

“Excellent for modern, tech-forward companies; heavily integrated with Slack/Teams and Salesforce.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning management syst · scale prompt · alternative

“If you want one modern platform to train employees AND customers: Choose WorkRamp.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Course authoring tools · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“WorkRamp is the standout choice, albeit with a quote-based pricing model” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Online course libraries · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Harsh reviews: "Worst LMS ever" – poor tracking, reporting, unchanged issues over years, slow support.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Learning management syst · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as WorkRamp, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WorkRamp was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

TalentLMS15 of 202Not among the top eight

Absorb LMS15 of 200Not among the top eight

Docebo13 of 203Not among the top eight

Cornerstone OnDemand9 of 201Not among the top eight

LearnUpon9 of 201Not among the top eight

Moodle7 of 200Not among the top eight

SAP Litmos7 of 200Not among the top eight

360Learning6 of 200Not among the top eight

Canvas LMS6 of 200Not among the top eight

SAP SuccessFactors Learning5 of 200Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named WorkRamp. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 20 answers that named WorkRamp and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

talentlms.com12

d2l.com10

docebo.com8

goskills.com7

learnworlds.com6

thinkific.com6

intellum.com5

360learning.com4

g2.com4

intervue.io4

Sixty-six of the sixty-six domain citations in answers naming WorkRamp came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

talentlms.com/blog/best-learning-management-systems7

d2l.com/blog/best-lms-platforms6

docebo.com/learning-network/blog/corporate-learning-management-systems5

goskills.com/resources/best-lms-compared5

intervue.io/blog/best-enterprise-lms-software4

360learning.com/blog/learning-management-system-examples3

axonify.com/blog/enterprise-learning-management-systems3

docebo.com/learning-network/blog/best-learning-management-system3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

workramp.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, WorkRamp takes 2% of first choices and TalentLMS takes 51%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “lms for employee training”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “learning management systems”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 3,600 a month (“workramp”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 34 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 8,841 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,689 · 107 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,160
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

11 ads · 11 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown September 2024, as WorkRamp, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 8 in the year, 3 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 9 of 61 in learning management syst

Segment leader

51%

TalentLMS

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 20 answers
Its own site cited: in 18 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on workramp.com

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	2025-10 to 2026-09	Latest	Categories named
Glossary or explainer	1	undated

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page workramp.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as WorkRamp

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as WorkRamp; a claim can dispute any of them.

WorkRamp (Learn:Up) 1

Follow WorkRamp

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

WorkRamp is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI-powered LMS for fast-growing teams
workramp.com
For: fast-growing teams
workramp.com
Certifications: certificationsvideo and written pitch certifications
Customers named: ZappiSprout Social
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What WorkRamp's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: workramp.com, trust.workramp.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when WorkRamp's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as WorkRamp, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for WorkRamp by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where WorkRamp is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name WorkRamp, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.