Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 64 of 71, unchanged
2 categories · RankedWorkForce Software
34Judge labels
3First choices
2Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Workforce management sui for enterprise buyers
Rank 28 of 78 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business69 of 76
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market28 of 78
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise17 of 81
0%19 labels
accepted challenger
In workforce management sui · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named WorkForce Software for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce management suites | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 28 of 78 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 17% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Workforce scheduling | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 82 of 108 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 37% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, WorkForce Software held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Workforce management sui · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 24 → 25 of 71
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 15 → 14 of 70
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce management sui | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 24 → 28 of 78 |
| Workforce scheduling | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 82 of 108, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated WorkForce Software across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated WorkForce Software across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labelsNone
Paraphrase7 labels2
Comparative9 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labels1
Negative5 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Enterprise → UKG alternatives like WorkForce Software” Grok 4.1 Fast · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as WorkForce Software, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WorkForce Software was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as WorkForce Software, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WorkForce Software was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named WorkForce Software. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 33 of the 33 answers that named WorkForce Software and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
guideflow.com20
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com10
g2.com10
peoplemanagingpeople.com9
assembled.com8
intervue.io8
nowsta.com8
darwinbox.com7
gitnux.org7
learn.g2.com7
Ninety-four of the ninety-four domain citations in answers naming WorkForce Software came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
workforce.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, WorkForce Software takes 0% of first choices and Rippling takes 17%.ShowHide
Search and answers
workforce.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, WorkForce Software takes 0% of first choices and Rippling takes 17%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “wfm suites”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “workforce management software”
3
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,000 a month (“workforce software”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 162 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 349,603 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 30,134 · 1,857 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 7,186
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess1 ads · 1 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days
First shown June 2025, as WORKPROVE LIMITED, verified.
On Google's pages: 1
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 28 of 78 in workforce management sui
Segment leader
17%
Rippling
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 33 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 33 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on workforce.com
16,132
subdomains included
Content
13,919
counted in the table below
Documentation
411
Product · Integration
18 · 95
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 13,496 | 4 | 2026-09-01 | Performance management, Workforce planning | |
| Comparison | 98 | 0 | 2025-07-01 | HRIS and HCM platforms | |
| Case study | 66 | 0 | 2026-04-24 | ||
| Conference or event | 55 | 1 | 2026-09-01 | Applicant tracking syste | |
| Template or tool | 53 | 0 | 2023-10-01 | Employee onboarding, Time and attendance | |
| Blog | 40 | 0 | 2026-06-16 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 40 | 0 | 2020-04-01 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 36 | 0 | 2026-05-01 | Performance management, Earned wage access | |
| Report or ebook | 32 | 0 | 2019-04-01 | ||
| Podcast or video | 3 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-01Sk8 expo 2026 conference or event
- 2026-09-01Jana reserva news or press
- 2026-08-21Quickbooks online price increase news or press
- 2026-08-04Nyc fair workweek news or press
- 2026-07-23Predictive scheduling laws news or press
- 2026-06-16Kart expo 2026 conference or event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page workforce.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name performance management (28); 0 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as WorkForce Software
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as WorkForce Software; a claim can dispute any of them.
WorkForce Suite 1
Follow WorkForce Software
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
WorkForce Software is its own company.ShowHide
The company
WorkForce Software is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- the #1 platform for scheduling, clocking in & out, time off, and compliance with employment law
- For
- businesses with hourly workers
- Price stated
- Workforce.com is licensed on a per user basis for the bundle or plan you select. The cost of the plans depends on which modules you want to use, how many staff you have, and your implementation requirements. workforce.com/pricing
- Customers named
- Winnipeg JetsShipley Do-NutsThird Space BrewingAltitudeGreenForceDomino'sThe Amenity CollectiveLake Elsinore Storm
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What WorkForce Software's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: workforce.com, workforce.com/pricing, workforce.com/security, workforce.com/solutions/operations, workforce.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when WorkForce Software's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as WorkForce Software, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for WorkForce Software by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where WorkForce Software is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name WorkForce Software, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.