| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce management suites | Core HR and payroll | 6% | 6 of 78 | 20% | 15 | accepted challenger | ▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Workforce scheduling | Core HR and payroll | 2% | 7 of 108 | 0% | 15 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Workforce planning | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 82 of 98 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 37% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Frontline employee apps | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 45 of 106 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Connecteam at 49% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
| Time and attendance | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 71 of 86 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Clockify at 12% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce management sui | 4% | 7% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 6 of 78 |
| Workforce scheduling | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 26 → 7 of 108 |
| Workforce planning | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 53 → 82 of 98 |
| Frontline employee apps | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 25 → 45 of 106 |
| Time and attendance | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 59 → 71 of 86 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Workforce.com - an all-in-one payroll, HR, scheduling, time and attendance, and workforce management platform built for hourly and shift-based teams.” Llama 4 Maverick · Workforce management sui · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Workforce.com is another top choice, praised for its centralized dashboard” Mistral Small · Workforce management sui · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Deputy and Workforce.com are the two platforms most reviewers put at the top” Muse Glimmer 30B · Workforce scheduling · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Workforce.com as the top WFM platform.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Workforce management sui · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Complaints about nonexistent customer service ("You can't even talk to anyone")” Kimi K2 · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · soft negative
“Customer support problems — users report being unable to reach anyone” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · soft negative
“Strong reviews overall, but several recurring drawbacks” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · soft negative
“Workforce.com doesn't offer self-scheduling” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Workforce planning · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 56 of the 59 answers that named Workforce.com and are not a share of its labels.
193 of the 193 domain citations in answers naming Workforce.com came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
First shown June 2025, as WORKPROVE LIMITED, verified.
On Google's pages: 1
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 13,496 | 4 | 2026-09-01 | Performance management, Workforce planning | |
| Comparison | 98 | 0 | 2025-07-01 | HRIS and HCM platforms | |
| Case study | 66 | 0 | 2026-04-24 | ||
| Conference or event | 55 | 1 | 2026-09-01 | Applicant tracking syste | |
| Template or tool | 53 | 0 | 2023-10-01 | Employee onboarding, Time and attendance | |
| Blog | 40 | 0 | 2026-06-16 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 40 | 0 | 2020-04-01 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 36 | 0 | 2026-05-01 | Performance management, Earned wage access | |
| Report or ebook | 32 | 0 | 2019-04-01 | ||
| Podcast or video | 3 | undated |
Every page workforce.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name performance management (28); 37 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Workforce.com's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: workforce.com, workforce.com/pricing, workforce.com/security, workforce.com/solutions/operations, workforce.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workforce.com's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workforce.com, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Workforce.com by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: