Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 1% in September 2026.
0%from 1% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 12 pointsNot ranked
1 category · Named, not rankedVisdum
4Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Visdum was named 3 times in Compensation management, where Pave led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market37 of 140
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise83 of 126
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In compensation management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Visdum for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compensation management | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 37 of 140 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Visdum held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Compensation management · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 74 → 34 of 131
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 77 of 109, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compensation management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 74 → 37 of 140 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Visdum across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Visdum across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“It offers granular control over payouts and is highly flexible for complex structures like clawbacks and multi-level approvals.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Compensation management · direct prompt · alternative
“Visdum is sales compensation infrastructure best for mid-market and enterprise B2B companies” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Compensation management · direct prompt · alternative
“Visdum for mid-market high performer on G2.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Compensation management · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Visdum, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Visdum was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Visdum, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Visdum was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Visdum. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Visdum and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
ravio.com4
hibob.com3
learn.g2.com3
visdum.comYour site3
qobra.co2
beqom.com1
captivateiq.com1
comprehensive.io1
darwinbox.com1
everstage.com1
Seventeen of the twenty domain citations in answers naming Visdum came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
visdum.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Visdum takes 0% of first choices and Pave takes 18%.ShowHide
Search and answers
visdum.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Visdum takes 0% of first choices and Pave takes 18%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “compensation platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “compensation management software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 70 a month (“visdum”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 3 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 15,225 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,341 · 32 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 951
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 37 of 140 in compensation management
Segment leader
18%
Pave
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 4 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 4 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on visdum.com
427
subdomains included
Content
257
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
1 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 172 | 18 | 2026-09-25 | Compensation management, Performance management | |
| Comparison | 39 | 1 | 2026-08-11 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 15 | 0 | 2026-06-18 | ||
| Case study | 13 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 10 | 0 | 2026-02-09 | ||
| Report or ebook | 7 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2025-11-04 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Best commission software for saas companies blog
- 2026-09-25Best commission software for global teams blog
- 2026-09-24Cash incentives blog
- 2026-09-22Best commission software for enterprises blog
- 2026-09-21Sales commission accounting blog
- 2026-09-17Commission software for finance teams blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page visdum.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Visdum
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Visdum is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Visdum is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Sales Compensation Software & Commission Management; "the easiest-to-use sales commission software," combining AI-adaptive comp plan modeling with fast implementation and best-in-class support to help finance and revenue teams streamline commission calculations.
- For
- finance and revenue teams; trusted by finance teams in mid-market and enterprise; Finance & Accounting; Revenue Operations; Sales Leaders; Sales Representatives
- Price stated
- Two fees. Nothing else. visdum.com/pricing
- Starting price
- the low five figures visdum.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- free proof of concept visdum.com/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 100 visdum.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001GDPRGDPR compliant#1 Easiest to Use in sales compensation on G2
- Customers named
- CV LibrarySubexSirionWebEngageHubiloCybleToolsGroupSpot AI
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Visdum's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: visdum.com, visdum.com/pricing, visdum.com/platform, visdum.com/case-studies, visdum.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Visdum's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Visdum, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Visdum by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Visdum is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Visdum, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.