AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › UserGuiding · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

UserGuiding

2Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. UserGuiding was named 1 time in Employee onboarding, where Rippling led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In employee onboarding · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named UserGuiding for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Employee onboardingOnboarding and employee experience0%53 of 870%1under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 25%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, UserGuiding held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Employee onboarding · by segment

Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 45 of 80, unchanged
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Employee onboarding0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 53 of 87, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated UserGuiding across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“No-code tours, checklists, templates; easy setup... Fastest implementation” Grok 4.1 Fast · Employee onboarding · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as UserGuiding, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and UserGuiding was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
BambooHR2 of 21Not among the top eight
ADP2 of 20Not among the top eight
Appcues2 of 20Not among the top eight
Gusto2 of 20Not among the top eight
UKG Pro2 of 20Not among the top eight
WalkMe2 of 20Not among the top eight
Workday2 of 20Not among the top eight
Chameleon1 of 20Not among the top eight
Deel1 of 20Not among the top eight
Eddy1 of 20Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named UserGuiding. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named UserGuiding and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hr.university2
joinhomebase.com2
peoplemanagingpeople.com2
userguiding.comYour site2
albato.com1
appcues.com1
appsruntheworld.com1
asana.com1
atlassian.com1
bizbot.com1

Twelve of the fourteen domain citations in answers naming UserGuiding came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

userguiding.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, UserGuiding takes 0% of first choices and Rippling takes 25%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “onboarding platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “employee onboarding software”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
390 a month (“userguiding”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 9,819 a month
Searches its site ranks for
7,113 · 41 in the top three
Sites linking to it
4,696
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
10 ads · 8 text, 1 image, 1 video · 2 shown in the last 30 days

First shown September 2022, as YNOT PARTNERS YAZE IM PAZARLAMA VE DANIŞMANLIK ANONİM ŞİRKETİ, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 3 in the year, 7 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 53 of 87 in employee onboarding
Segment leader
25%
Rippling
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
2 answers
Its own site cited
in 2 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on userguiding.com
3,877
subdomains included
Content
1,156
counted in the table below
Documentation
351
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog847undatedEmployee onboarding, Employee engagement surv
Comparison138undated
Podcast or video40undated
Case study36undated
Webinar or virtual event34undated
Template or tool24undatedEmployee onboarding
Report or ebook14undated
Glossary or explainer14undated
Conference or event5undated
News or press4undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page userguiding.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow UserGuiding

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

UserGuiding is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
All-in-one Product Adoption Software
For
product teams
Price stated
From $174/Mo billed yearly; From $349/Mo billed yearly; Let's Talk userguiding.com/pricing
Starting price
174 userguiding.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Free Trial userguiding.com
Integrations claimed
12 userguiding.com/pricing
Certifications
SOC 2 Type 2GDPRHIPAAISO 27001LGPDSOC2HIPAA ComplianceG2 Top 50 Customer Service Products 2025
Hosting
Frankfurt, Germany
Customers named
KeyholeIndicataNextfitCitizenshipperIdetaLogComexOpinewGroveHr

What UserGuiding's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: userguiding.com, userguiding.com/pricing, trust.userguiding.com, userguiding.com/customers, userguiding.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when UserGuiding's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as UserGuiding, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for UserGuiding by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where UserGuiding is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name UserGuiding, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at userguiding.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.