Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 37 of 89, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedTroop Messenger
3Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Troop Messenger was named 2 times in Frontline employee apps, where Connecteam led with 49%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business38 of 90
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market43 of 106
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In frontline employee apps · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Troop Messenger for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontline employee apps | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 43 of 106 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Connecteam at 49% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Troop Messenger held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Frontline employee apps · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 38 of 100, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontline employee apps | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 43 of 106, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Troop Messenger across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Troop Messenger across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Troop Messenger, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Troop Messenger was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Troop Messenger, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Troop Messenger was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Troop Messenger. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Troop Messenger and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
agilityportal.io3
mangoapps.com3
peoplemanagingpeople.com3
changeengine.com2
guideflow.com2
redeapp.com2
rock.so2
troopmessenger.comYour site2
turnonwork.com2
checkthat.ai1
Twenty of the twenty-two domain citations in answers naming Troop Messenger came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on troopmessenger.com
1,131
subdomains included
Content
952
counted in the table below
Documentation
50
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 853 | 52 | 2026-10-02 | HRIS and HCM platforms, Workforce scheduling | |
| Comparison | 78 | 1 | 2026-07-19 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 14 | 0 | 2026-07-06 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | 0 | 2025-04-23 | ||
| Report or ebook | 2 | 0 | 2026-05-31 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 2 | 2026-09-06 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-10-02Field service communication blog
- 2026-09-30Explainer videos higher engagement blog
- 2026-09-29Best qr code generator blog
- 2026-09-29Urgent care patient communication blog
- 2026-09-29Best kubernetes security providers blog
- 2026-09-29How better team communication can reduce credentialing delays blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page troopmessenger.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
Follow Troop Messenger
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Troop Messenger is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Troop Messenger is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Secure Team Messaging & Collaboration Software for Enterprises
- For
- Enterprises
- Price stated
- Premium $2.5 Per User; Enterprise $5 Per User; Superior $9 Per User; Trial $0 Per User troopmessenger.com
- Starting price
- 0 troopmessenger.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free Trial; Enterprise Edition for 7 days troopmessenger.com
- Customers named
- OPG Power GenerationCustomer Capital ConsultingTransgridTesttex India Laboratories Pvt Ltd.Toppan Speciality Films Pvt LtdIndian AirForceEuropean Space Agency (ESA)UKHO, Ministry of Defence, UK
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What Troop Messenger's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: troopmessenger.com, troopmessenger.com/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Troop Messenger's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Troop Messenger, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Troop Messenger by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Troop Messenger is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Troop Messenger, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.