Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 16 → 20 of 89
1 category · RankedLRN
20Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Compliance training for mid-market buyers
Rank 19 of 92 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of LRN →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market19 of 92
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise22 of 94
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
In compliance training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named LRN for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance training | Learning and development | 0% | 19 of 92 | 0% | 10 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, LRN held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Compliance training · by segment
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 18 → 23 of 86
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance training | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 19 of 92 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated LRN across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated LRN across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative15 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Reputable alternatives often cited positively: Traliant, Emtrain, LRN, Everfi, BizLibrary, Skillsoft” Grok 4.1 Fast · Compliance training · negative prompt · alternative
“Go with NAVEX or LRN if you are an enterprise Chief Compliance Officer” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Compliance training · comparative prompt · alternative
“start with NAVEX, LRN, or SAI360” GPT-6 Luna · Compliance training · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LRN, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LRN was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LRN, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LRN was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LRN. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 20 answers that named LRN and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
bizlibrary.com13
coggno.com13
traliant.com12
emtrain.com11
navex.com11
easyllama.com9
worldmetrics.org8
shiftelt.com7
expertinsights.com6
valamis.com6
Ninety-six of the ninety-six domain citations in answers naming LRN came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
lrn.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, LRN takes 0% of first choices and Traliant takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
lrn.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, LRN takes 0% of first choices and Traliant takes 22%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “compliance training platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “compliance training providers”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,900 a month (“lrn”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 210 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 7,063 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,680 · 95 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,226
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 1 clicks and $52 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 19 of 92 in compliance training
Segment leader
22%
Traliant
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 20 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 20 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on lrn.com
1,983
subdomains included
Content
1,414
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
35 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,148 | 21 | 2026-09-23 | Compliance training, Performance management | |
| Conference or event | 148 | 0 | 2026-04-23 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 55 | 0 | 2026-05-18 | ||
| Case study | 29 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 10 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 9 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 7 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 5 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 3 | undated | Compliance training |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23Lrn launches catalyst voice to help organizations connect hotline reporting to action blog
- 2026-09-16Is your code of conduct a resource or a formality blog
- 2026-09-15Lrn launches catalyst policy to transform global corporate policy governance blog
- 2026-08-31Ai accountability in action key takeaways for strengthening responsible ai governance blog
- 2026-08-31Ai accountability in action key takeaways for strengthening responsible ai governance blog
- 2026-08-27Lrn corporation wins gold silver in brandon hall group hcm excellence awards for sixth consecutive year blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- reported April 2026ALB Tokyo In-House Legal Summit 2026Tokyo · spoke
- April 15, 2026ALB Tokyo In-House Legal Summit 2026Tokyo · spoke
As the event pages on lrn.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page lrn.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as LRN
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as LRN; a claim can dispute any of them.
LRN Corp 1LRN Corp. 1
Follow LRN
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
LRN is its own company.ShowHide
The company
LRN is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Purpose-built solutions for inspiring ethical, compliant workforces
- For
- organizations, no matter the size or scale
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type 2ISO 27001:2022GDPR
- Hosting
- EUUS
- Customers named
- PepsiCoAmerican ExpressSanofi GlobalPROEZASanofiHexcelCortevaEPRI
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations
What LRN's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: lrn.com, lrn.com/security, lrn.com/products/mobile-app, lrn.com/case-studies, lrn.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LRN's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LRN, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LRN by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where LRN is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name LRN, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.