AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › SAI360 · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

SAI360

35Judge labels
2First choices
3Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Compliance training for enterprise buyers
Rank 20 of 92 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 9% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of SAI360 →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In compliance training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SAI360 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Compliance trainingLearning and development0%20 of 929%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Whistleblowing and investigationsCore HR and payroll0%53 of 1070%1under 10 labels · led by FaceUp at 25%

Movement

Since September 2026, SAI360 held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Compliance training · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 50 → 46 of 61
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 18 → 21 of 89
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 9 → 10 of 86

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Compliance training0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 18 → 20 of 92
Whistleblowing0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 53 of 107, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated SAI360 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500011
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast01102
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labels1
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative21 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative35 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Multinational or regulated organizations seeking training connected to risk and compliance processes” GPT-6 Luna · Compliance training · comparative prompt · alternative
“Enterprises seeking a unified Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) ecosystem.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Compliance training · comparative prompt · alternative
“Often positioned around structured audit reporting and compliance workflows.” Perplexity Sonar · Compliance training · comparative prompt · alternative
“SAI360 | Configurable workflows | Audit trails, policy integration” Grok 4.1 Fast · Whistleblowing · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Dated interfaces, rigid customization, and lackluster reporting features that limit visibility (SAI360)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Compliance training · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SAI360, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAI360 was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
NAVEX26 of 354Not among the top eight
Skillsoft Percipio20 of 351Not among the top eight
Traliant20 of 350Not among the top eight
BizLibrary15 of 351Not among the top eight
EasyLlama13 of 353Not among the top eight
Everfi11 of 350Not among the top eight
Cornerstone OnDemand10 of 350Not among the top eight
LRN10 of 350Not among the top eight
HSI9 of 350Not among the top eight
Ethena8 of 351Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAI360. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 35 answers that named SAI360 and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

sai360.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SAI360 takes 0% of first choices and Traliant takes 22%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “compliance training platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “compliance training providers”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,000 a month (“sai360”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
27 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 3,119 a month
Searches its site ranks for
901 · 54 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,024
Paid Google search
11 searches its ads show for, about 137 clicks and $8,800 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
67 ads · 49 text, 13 image, 5 video · 23 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2025, as SAI360 Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 53 in the year, 14 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 20 of 92 in compliance training
Segment leader
22%
Traliant
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
35 answers
Its own site cited
in 32 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on sai360.com
1,834
subdomains included
Content
1,080
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
81 · 2
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog773302026-09-28
Webinar or virtual event14392026-09-22
Report or ebook10912026-07-08
Glossary or explainer1402026-05-08
Case study1102024-07-23
Conference or event1102026-05-26
Template or tool1122026-09-25
Comparison732026-08-27
News or press1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page sai360.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as SAI360

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAI360; a claim can dispute any of them.
SAI360 (Connected Learning) 1SAI360 (formerly SAI Global) 1

Follow SAI360

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

SAI360 is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
GRC | Governance Risk and Compliance Software
For
global risk and compliance teams
Price stated
Contact for pricing sai360.com/pricing
Certifications
System Administrator Certification
Customers named
ColgatePanasonic Energy of North AmericaSIGNAL IDUNAStewart TitleKraft HeinzPrime TherapeuticsHenry ScheinNorth American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC)
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What SAI360's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: sai360.com, sai360.com/pricing, sai360.com/use-cases/compliance, sai360.com/platform-page, sai360.com/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAI360's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAI360, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SAI360 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where SAI360 is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name SAI360, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sai360.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.