Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 9 → 28 of 60
1 category · Named, not rankedTestTrick
10Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. TestTrick was named 2 times in Technical hiring assessm, where HackerRank led with 17%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business31 of 61
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market21 of 71
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise31 of 43
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In technical hiring assessm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named TestTrick for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical hiring assessments | Talent acquisition | 0% | 21 of 71 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by HackerRank at 17% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, TestTrick held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Technical hiring assessm · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 46 → 18 of 67
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 28 of 41, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical hiring assessm | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 46 → 21 of 71 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated TestTrick across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated TestTrick across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“TestTrick / Woven: These focus on scenario-based engineering” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Technical hiring assessm · negative prompt · alternative
“Budget-conscious: TestTrick, Toggl Hire” MiniMax M2.5 · Technical hiring assessm · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as TestTrick, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TestTrick was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as TestTrick, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TestTrick was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TestTrick. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named TestTrick and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
testtrick.comYour site9
codesignal.com4
hackerrank.com4
adaface.com3
bryq.com3
firsthr.app3
goodfit.so3
peoplemanagingpeople.com3
selectsoftwarereviews.com3
testlify.com3
Twenty-nine of the thirty-eight domain citations in answers naming TestTrick came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
testtrick.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, TestTrick takes 0% of first choices and HackerRank takes 17%.ShowHide
Search and answers
testtrick.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, TestTrick takes 0% of first choices and HackerRank takes 17%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “coding assessment platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “technical assessment platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 30 a month (“testtrick”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 901 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 650 · 27 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 231
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 21 of 71 in technical hiring assessm
Segment leader
17%
HackerRank
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 10 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 10 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on testtrick.com
560
subdomains included
Content
162
counted in the table below
Documentation
59
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 107 | 0 | 2026-06-25 | Applicant tracking syste, Candidate assessment | |
| Comparison | 44 | 0 | 2026-06-23 | ||
| Case study | 7 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2026-06-16 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 0 | 2026-01-27 |
Most recent
- 2026-06-25Personality assessment tools blog
- 2026-06-25Cognitive intelligence tests blog
- 2026-06-24Enterprise assessment software blog
- 2026-06-24Types of psychometric tests for hiring in 2026 a practical guide blog
- 2026-06-24Technical skills assessments explained blog
- 2026-06-23Future of recruitment trends blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page testtrick.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow TestTrick
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
TestTrick is its own company.ShowHide
The company
TestTrick is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI Powered Talent Assessment Platform
- For
- Hiring teams; talent teams
- Price stated
- free trial testtrick.com
- Starting price
- 0 testtrick.com
- Free plan or trial
- free, fully functional trial. No card required. testtrick.com
- Integrations claimed
- 3 testtrick.com
- Certifications
- ISO/IEC 27001GDPR
- Customers named
- Manafa TechnologiesHabib ModarbaHorizon TechnologiesTrillium Information Security SystemsMple.AICSI EngineeringManafa TechonologiesFirst Habib Modaraba
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What TestTrick's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: testtrick.com, testtrick.com/pricing, testtrick.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TestTrick's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TestTrick, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for TestTrick by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where TestTrick is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name TestTrick, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.