Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 24 of 80, unchanged
2 categories · RankedAdaface
22Judge labels
2First choices
2Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Technical hiring assessm for small business buyers
Rank 24 of 118 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business24 of 80
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market24 of 118
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In candidate assessment · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Adaface for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate assessment | Talent acquisition | 0% | 24 of 118 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 52% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Technical hiring assessments | Talent acquisition | 0% | 23 of 71 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by HackerRank at 17% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Adaface held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Candidate assessment · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 17 → 37 of 115
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate assessment | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 17 → 24 of 118 |
| Technical hiring assessm | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 23 of 71 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Adaface across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Adaface across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative5 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labels1
Scale-constrained2 labels1
Negative5 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Adaface is a versatile skills assessment platform designed to help you quickly screen candidates across various roles.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Candidate assessment · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Adaface credits based pricing starting at $180/year is the lowest annual floor in the startup-focused comparisons.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Technical hiring assessm · budget prompt · alternative
“If your focus is heavily on technical or customer-facing roles, Adaface is also a strong contender.” Mistral Small · Candidate assessment · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Adaface, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adaface was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Adaface, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adaface was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Adaface. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 22 answers that named Adaface and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
adaface.comYour site16
hackerrank.com12
selectsoftwarereviews.com12
testgorilla.com12
g2.com11
testtrick.com11
testlify.com8
bryq.com6
codesignal.com6
fueler.io6
Eighty-four of the 100 domain citations in answers naming Adaface came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
adaface.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Adaface takes 0% of first choices and TestGorilla takes 52%.ShowHide
Search and answers
adaface.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Adaface takes 0% of first choices and TestGorilla takes 52%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “assessment platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “pre-employment assessment platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 260 a month (“adaface”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 2 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 20,658 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 16,947 · 79 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,312
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 24 of 118 in candidate assessment
Segment leader
52%
TestGorilla
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 22 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 22 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on adaface.com
2,601
subdomains included
Content
1,459
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,091 | 0 | 2024-08-20 | Recruiting CRM, Employee onboarding | |
| Glossary or explainer | 190 | 0 | 2025-05-21 | Workforce planning, 360 feedback | |
| Comparison | 169 | 0 | 2025-05-21 | ||
| Case study | 6 | 0 | 2025-05-21 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2025-06-18 |
Most recent
- 2025-06-18Offboarding checklist email template or tool
- 2025-05-21Adaface vs equip comparison
- 2025-05-21Glossary glossary or explainer
- 2025-05-21Tech glossary for recruiters template or tool
- 2025-05-21How old is tech skill template or tool
- 2025-05-21Hanu campus recruitment case study
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page adaface.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Adaface
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Adaface is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Adaface is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Assessment platform
- For
- recruitment teams in enterprises globally
- Price stated
- USD 0.00 to 180.00 adaface.com
- Starting price
- 0.00 adaface.com
- Free plan or trial
- Start free trial adaface.com
- Certifications
- GDPRCCPA
- Customers named
- Singapore GovernmentLove, BonitoMonoceptHanuStaffing Recruitment FirmProfessional Services FirmPuffyAffable
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What Adaface's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: adaface.com, adaface.com/pricing, adaface.com/trust, adaface.com/case-studies, adaface.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Adaface's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Adaface, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Adaface by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Adaface is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Adaface, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.