Small business▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 59 → 7 of 60
3 categories · RankedCodility
213Judge labels
12First choices
60Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
11% in Technical hiring assessm for enterprise buyers
Rank 6 of 71 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
3 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 25% of its 53 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Codility →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business9 of 61
3%46 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market6 of 71
9%53 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise4 of 43
11%59 labels
accepted challenger
In technical hiring assessm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Codility for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical hiring assessments | Talent acquisition | 9% | 6 of 71 | 25% | 53 | accepted challenger | ▲+5Since September 2026: 5% → 10%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Candidate assessment | Talent acquisition | 0% | 14 of 118 | 13% | 15 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Skills intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 71 of 127 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Skills Base at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Codility held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Technical hiring assessm · by segment
Mid-market▲+5Since September 2026: 5% → 10%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
10%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 7 → 4 of 67
Enterprise▼−6Since September 2026: 19% → 13%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
13%from 19% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 2 → 4 of 41
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical hiring assessm | 5% | 10% | ▲+5Since September 2026: 5% → 10%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 6 of 71 |
| Candidate assessment | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 14 of 118 |
| Skills intelligence | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 35 → 71 of 127 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Codility across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Codility across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 9 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct40 labels6
Paraphrase21 labels1
Comparative57 labels7not counted in share
Budget-constrained27 labels1
Scale-constrained28 labels4
Negative40 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative213 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 21 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“### 1. Codility - Best for: Mid-market to enterprise companies needing secure, scalable assessments” MiniMax M2.5 · Technical hiring assessm · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose HackerRank or Codility if you are an enterprise needing rigorous automated screening” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Technical hiring assessm · comparative prompt · first choice
“stick to reputable ones like Codility/HackerRank for tech (gold standard per comparisons)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Candidate assessment · negative prompt · first choice
“Codility, which is considered the gold standard for technical hiring assessments.” Llama 4 Maverick · Candidate assessment · negative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid if budget is the main constraint... Codility tends to start higher and is more enterprise-oriented” GPT-5.4 mini · Technical hiring assessm · budget prompt · hard negative
“(e.g., HackerRank, Codility, CodeSignal): ... often criticized for not reflecting real-world job tasks” Mistral Small · Technical hiring assessm · negative prompt · hard negative
“High negative sentiment (e.g., labeled "hostile candidate experience" in AI model analyses)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Technical hiring assessm · negative prompt · hard negative
“Algorithm-based tests that are more relevant to junior developers than experienced hires.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Technical hiring assessm · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Codility, over the 212 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Codility was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Codility, over the 212 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Codility was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Codility. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 199 of the 212 answers that named Codility and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
hackerrank.com109
codility.comYour site87
testgorilla.com77
selectsoftwarereviews.com71
g2.com63
testtrick.com61
codesignal.com56
testlify.com56
adaface.com48
bryq.com46
587 of the 674 domain citations in answers naming Codility came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
codility.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Codility takes 9% of first choices and HackerRank takes 17%.ShowHide
Search and answers
codility.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Codility takes 9% of first choices and HackerRank takes 17%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “coding assessment platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “technical assessment platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 3,600 a month (“codility”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 114 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,042 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 523 · 48 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,040
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 2 clicks and $108 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
9%
rank 6 of 71 in technical hiring assessm
Segment leader
17%
HackerRank
- First choices
- 12 across its categories
- Named in
- 212 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 199 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on codility.com
422
subdomains included
Content
215
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
1 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 141 | 1 | 2026-07-31 | Skills intelligence | |
| Report or ebook | 23 | 0 | 2025-10-02 | Candidate assessment | |
| Case study | 17 | 0 | 2022-10-19 | ||
| Conference or event | 17 | 0 | 2023-11-16 | ||
| Comparison | 12 | 10 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | 0 | 2025-11-21 | Skills intelligence | |
| Template or tool | 2 | 1 | 2026-08-06 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Codility alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-23Codility vs leetcode comparison
- 2026-09-23Codility vs blueoptima comparison
- 2026-08-06Eu ai act hiring checklist template or tool
- 2026-08-03Codility vs codesignal comparison
- 2026-08-03Codility vs coderpad comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page codility.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Codility
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Codility is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Codility is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The #1 online coding test & interview platform for enterprises. Assess technical talent with valid skill-based assessments and interviews.
- For
- enterprises
- Price stated
- Starter Annual billing only $1200; Scale Monthly Yearly – Save 17% $6000 $6000; Custom Bespoke requirements Let’s talk codility.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 1200 codility.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Request a free trial codility.com
- Integrations claimed
- 5 codility.com/pricing
- Certifications
- SOC 2 auditedISO 27001 certifiedCCPA and GDPR compliantWCAG 2.2 AA accessibleSOC 2 Type IIISO 27001GDPR compliantGDPR
- Hosting
- EUUSEU and US data hosting on AWS
- Customers named
- GitHubSpaceXTeslaEYLSEGSAPBarclaysCiti
What Codility's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: codility.com, codility.com/pricing, trust.codility.com, codility.com/platform, codility.com/solutions/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Codility's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Codility, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Codility by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Codility is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Codility, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.