Small business▼−10Since September 2026: 26% → 15%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
15%from 26% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 3 pointsRank 1 → 2 of 60
3 categories · RankedCoderPad
142Judge labels
16First choices
8Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
17% in Technical hiring assessm for small business buyers
Rank 3 of 71 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 6% of its 52 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of CoderPad →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business2 of 61
17%46 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market3 of 71
10%52 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise8 of 43
0%38 labels
accepted challenger
In technical hiring assessm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named CoderPad for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical hiring assessments | Talent acquisition | 10% | 3 of 71 | 6% | 52 | accepted challenger | ▼−10Since September 2026: 21% → 10%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Candidate assessment | Talent acquisition | 0% | 25 of 118 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 52% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Video interviewing | Talent acquisition | 0% | 29 of 66 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Spark Hire at 50% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, CoderPad held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Technical hiring assessm · by segment
Mid-market▼−10Since September 2026: 21% → 10%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
10%from 21% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 3 pointsRank 2 → 3 of 67
Enterprise▼−9Since September 2026: 9% → 0%, −9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 9% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 4 → 8 of 41
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical hiring assessm | 21% | 10% | ▼−10Since September 2026: 21% → 10%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 3 of 71 |
| Candidate assessment | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 26 → 25 of 118 |
| Video interviewing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 24 → 29 of 66 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated CoderPad across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated CoderPad across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct20 labels2
Paraphrase28 labels12
Comparative41 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained11 labelsNone
Scale-constrained17 labels2
Negative25 labels13not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative142 labels in all, every segment counted; 16 of the 30 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“CoderPad | End-to-End & Live Pairing | Offers a great developer experience. Candidates use a real VS Code-like environment.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Technical hiring assessm · scale prompt · first choice
“CoderPad if you want to interview candidates in real-time to gauge their communication and debugging skills.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Technical hiring assessm · comparative prompt · first choice
“Known for live, collaborative interviews, which can provide a more realistic candidate experience” Mistral Small · Technical hiring assessm · negative prompt · first choice
“Great for live coding interviews with a clean, reliable IDE. Preferred by many engineers” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Technical hiring assessm · negative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“CoderPad lacks webcam monitoring and browser lockdown features... the site can get buggy, has limited pre-built questions” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Technical hiring assessm · negative prompt · soft negative
“Advanced features locked behind higher tiers, occasional bugs, limited question library” MiniMax M2.5 · Technical hiring assessm · negative prompt · soft negative
“CoderPad – Time management issues, weaker proctoring.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Technical hiring assessm · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CoderPad, over the 142 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CoderPad was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CoderPad, over the 142 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CoderPad was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CoderPad. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 133 of the 142 answers that named CoderPad and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
hackerrank.com89
codility.com62
codesignal.com53
coderpad.ioYour site49
selectsoftwarereviews.com48
g2.com44
testgorilla.com37
testlify.com34
testtrick.com34
augmentcode.com33
434 of the 483 domain citations in answers naming CoderPad came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
coderpad.io ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, CoderPad takes 10% of first choices and HackerRank takes 17%.ShowHide
Search and answers
coderpad.io ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, CoderPad takes 10% of first choices and HackerRank takes 17%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “coding assessment platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “technical assessment platforms”
2
- Searches for its name, Google
- 18,100 a month (“coderpad”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 269 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 34,657 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,991 · 259 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,196
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
10%
rank 3 of 71 in technical hiring assessm
Segment leader
17%
HackerRank
- First choices
- 16 across its categories
- Named in
- 142 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 133 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on coderpad.io
912
subdomains included
Content
553
counted in the table below
Documentation
128
Product · Integration
34 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 395 | 8 | 2026-09-10 | Applicant tracking syste, Recruiting CRM | |
| Conference or event | 74 | 5 | 2026-10-07 | ||
| News or press | 32 | 1 | 2026-07-07 | ||
| Case study | 22 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 13 | 0 | 2023-08-28 | ||
| Comparison | 7 | 0 | 2023-04-17 | ||
| Report or ebook | 5 | 0 | 2025-11-03 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 0 | 2024-12-04 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 0 | 2023-03-30 |
Most recent
- 2026-10-07Everyone says theyre ai fluent can they prove it conference or event
- 2026-09-10How to hire for ai fluency now that its a critical skill blog
- 2026-09-03Hiring ai engineers offer blog
- 2026-08-26How to hire for ai fluency now that its a critical skill conference or event
- 2026-08-215 unfiltered takes on ai that engineering leaders actually believe blog
- 2026-08-21Hot takes on hiring ai fluency is a myth blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page coderpad.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as CoderPad
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CoderPad; a claim can dispute any of them.
CoderPad (CodinGame) 1CoderPad (by Uber) 1Coderpad 1
Follow CoderPad
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
CoderPad is its own company.ShowHide
The company
CoderPad is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Coding Interview & Technical Assessment Platform
- For
- hiring teams
- Price stated
- Monthly Annual Save 20% coderpad.io/pricing
- Starting price
- 80 coderpad.io/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Sign up free coderpad.io
- Certifications
- Security compliantSOC2 Type 2CISSP-certifiedGDPRCCPA
- Customers named
- Harmattan AIMcAfeeAlipes Capitalmonday.comMNTNGameloftSIIPersonio
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What CoderPad's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: coderpad.io, coderpad.io/pricing, coderpad.io/security, coderpad.io/platform, coderpad.io/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CoderPad's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CoderPad, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CoderPad by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where CoderPad is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name CoderPad, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where CoderPad is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where CoderPad is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideCoderPad is among the products AI models recommend first in Technical hiring assessments this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.