Small business▼−7Since September 2026: 9% → 2%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 9% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 4 → 8 of 60
2 categories · RankedTestDome
46Judge labels
9First choices
4Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
3% in Technical hiring assessm for small business buyers
Rank 8 of 71 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 22% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business6 of 61
3%19 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market8 of 71
7%9 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise14 of 43
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In technical hiring assessm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named TestDome for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical hiring assessments | Talent acquisition | 7% | 8 of 71 | 22% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by HackerRank at 17% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Candidate assessment | Talent acquisition | 4% | 6 of 118 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 52% | ▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, TestDome held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Technical hiring assessm · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 8% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 5 → 8 of 67
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 38 → 15 of 41
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate assessment | 0% | 5% | ▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 25 → 6 of 118 |
| Technical hiring assessm | 8% | 6% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 8 of 71 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated TestDome across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated TestDome across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labels1
Comparative11 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained13 labels8
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative9 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative46 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“TestDome’s prepaid packs “from $100 for 5 candidates (down to $7 per candidate at volume)” and Coderbyte per-candidate checkout are the most contract-free options noted.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Technical hiring assessm · budget prompt · first choice
“Go with TestDome if you are a small business hiring 1–10 developers a year. It has the lowest starting cost ($100)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Technical hiring assessm · budget prompt · first choice
“TestDome - Strong for both technical and non-technical roles with a large library of pre-built assessments” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Candidate assessment · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you hire infrequently: TestDome (pay-per-candidate, no commitment)” MiniMax M2.5 · Candidate assessment · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid: Massive, Uncurated Out-of-the-Box Question Banks (e.g., Older/Basic HackerRank or TestDome Tiers)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Technical hiring assessm · negative prompt · soft negative
“TestDome's technical focus leaves gaps in soft skills and personality assessment coverage” Muse Glimmer 30B · Candidate assessment · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“TestDome relies heavily on MCQs and short logical puzzles rather than hands-on coding.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Technical hiring assessm · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as TestDome, over the 46 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TestDome was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as TestDome, over the 46 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TestDome was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TestDome. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 39 of the 46 answers that named TestDome and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
testgorilla.com22
hackerrank.com17
bryq.com16
g2.com14
testdome.comYour site14
testlify.com14
selectsoftwarereviews.com12
testtrick.com12
codesignal.com9
adaface.com8
124 of the 138 domain citations in answers naming TestDome came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
testdome.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, TestDome takes 7% of first choices and HackerRank takes 17%.ShowHide
Search and answers
testdome.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, TestDome takes 7% of first choices and HackerRank takes 17%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “coding assessment platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “technical assessment platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 880 a month (“testdome”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 22 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 34,709 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,535 · 554 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,545
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
7%
rank 8 of 71 in technical hiring assessm
Segment leader
17%
HackerRank
- First choices
- 9 across its categories
- Named in
- 46 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 39 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on testdome.com
231
subdomains included
Content
39
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
4 · 3
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 28 | 0 | 2026-05-19 | ||
| Report or ebook | 6 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 5 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-05-19How testdome automatically evaluates prompt engineering tests blog
- 2026-05-06How testdome automatically evaluates ms excel tests blog
- 2026-03-13Ai scoring for open ended test questions blog
- 2026-03-11How to run better remote interviews blog
- 2026-02-19One way video interview questions see skills in action blog
- 2024-10-16Cognitive ability tests improve hiring performance blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page testdome.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow TestDome
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
TestDome is its own company.ShowHide
The company
TestDome is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- an online skills testing platform that helps employers screen candidates with work-sample tests and interview assessments
- For
- employers
- Price stated
- Screen 100+ skills for $7/candidate; Flexible, pay-per-candidate pricing from $7; AggregateOffer highPrice 20 lowPrice 7 USD testdome.com
- Starting price
- 7 testdome.com
- Free plan or trial
- Start Your 14-Day Trial testdome.com
- Certifications
- GDPR and data retentionPCI Level 1 payment gatewayGDPR compliant
- Customers named
- LuckyWare ProTurkish AirlinesEndavaUnicefAdobeIndeedEYNHS
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What TestDome's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: testdome.com, testdome.com/pricing, testdome.com/use-cases/luckyware-pro, testdome.com/customers, testdome.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TestDome's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TestDome, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for TestDome by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where TestDome is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name TestDome, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.