Every category where a model named TalentHR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
HRIS and HCM platforms	Core HR and payroll	2%	11 of 66	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 26%	▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Employee onboarding	Onboarding and employee experience	2%	12 of 87	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 25%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
Leave and absence management	Core HR and payroll	2%	11 of 95	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 28%	▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Applicant tracking systems	Talent acquisition	0%	25 of 65	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 40%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
HR AI assistants	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	39 of 142	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by MeBeBot at 21%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
HR compliance and policy management	Core HR and payroll	0%	74 of 97	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 19%	▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
HR help desk and case management	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	82 of 108	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Zoho Desk at 19%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Recruitment marketing and career sites	Talent acquisition	0%	71 of 104	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 23%
Succession planning	Performance and talent management	0%	58 of 93	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 28%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, TalentHR held within the floor in all nine categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · HRIS and HCM platforms · by segment

Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

4%from 2% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 5 of 47, unchanged

Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

2%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 14 → 11 of 57

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
HRIS and HCM platforms	0%	2%	▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 14 → 11 of 66
Employee onboarding	0%	2%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.	New this edition	Rank 12 of 87, unchanged
Leave	0%	2%	▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 67 → 11 of 95
HR compliance	2%	0%	▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 23 → 74 of 97
Applicant tracking syste	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 26 → 25 of 65
HR AI assistants	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 39 of 142, unchanged
HR help desk	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 82 of 108, unchanged
Recruitment marketing	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 71 of 104, unchanged
Succession planning	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 58 of 93, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated TalentHR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	3	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	2	3	5

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained35 labels10

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative47 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you have under 10 employees and want a traditional HR hub: Choose TalentHR (100% free).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · HRIS and HCM platforms · budget prompt · first choice

“Best Free Option: TalentHR (up to 10 employees with full onboarding workflows)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Employee onboarding · budget prompt · first choice

“LeaveBoard and TalentHR stand out as the top leave management software options” Grok 4.1 Fast · Leave · budget prompt · first choice

“TalentHR offers the broadest free feature set (up to 10 users), but it's less specialized for leave management” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Leave · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as TalentHR, over the 47 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TalentHR was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

BambooHR24 of 473Not among the top eight

Zoho People17 of 474Not among the top eight

Gusto17 of 471Not among the top eight

Connecteam15 of 472Not among the top eight

Homebase13 of 472Not among the top eight

LeaveBoard12 of 477Not among the top eight

Vacation Tracker10 of 473Not among the top eight

Timetastic8 of 472Not among the top eight

Freshteam8 of 471Not among the top eight

Rippling8 of 471Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TalentHR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 47 of the 47 answers that named TalentHR and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

peoplemanagingpeople.com29

forbes.com23

firsthr.app20

fitsmallbusiness.com17

talenthr.ioYour site15

actiplans.com14

g2.com14

guideflow.com13

capterra.com12

joinhomebase.com11

153 of the 168 domain citations in answers naming TalentHR came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

actiplans.com/blog/free-leave-management-software13

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-leave-management-systems13

employsome.com/best/leave-management-software9

fitsmallbusiness.com/best-leave-management-system8

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-leave-management-software8

firsthr.app/compare/general/leave-management-system7

traqq.com/blog/best-absence-and-leave-management-software7

guideflow.com/blog/leave-management-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

talenthr.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, TalentHR takes 2% of first choices and Rippling takes 26%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “hris”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best hris”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 480 a month (“talenthr”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 1 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 89,831 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 14,535 · 221 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,497
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

42 ads · 35 text, 5 image, 2 video · 32 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2023, as Epignosis LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 15 in the year, 27 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 11 of 66 in HRIS and HCM platforms

Segment leader

26%

Rippling

First choices: 10 across its categories
Named in: 47 answers
Its own site cited: in 47 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on talenthr.io

888

subdomains included

Content

793

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

42 · 8

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	668	undated		HRIS and HCM platforms, Employee onboarding
Comparison	75	0	2025-03-07	HRIS and HCM platforms
Template or tool	26	undated
Webinar or virtual event	12	undated		Performance management
Case study	6	undated
Conference or event	2	undated
Glossary or explainer	2	undated
Podcast or video	2	undated

Most recent

2025-03-07Time to hire vs time to fill comparison

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page talenthr.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow TalentHR

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

TalentHR is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Intuitive, Cost-effective, All-in-one-HR Tool.
talenthr.io
For: small and mid-size teams
talenthr.io
Price stated: Flexible pricing talenthr.io
Starting price: 2 talenthr.io/pricing
Free plan or trial: Start free, forever, upgrade whenever. No CC needed. Sign up for a free account with no time limits talenthr.io
Hosting: Worldwide
Customers named: Konstantinos V.Tem K.Jordan J.Nikoletta B.Diamond K.Pinelopi Z.Alexander C.Triparound
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations, certifications

What TalentHR's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: talenthr.io, talenthr.io, talenthr.io/pricing, talenthr.io/security, talenthr.io/platform. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TalentHR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TalentHR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for TalentHR by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where TalentHR is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name TalentHR, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.