AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Skuad · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Skuad

8Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Skuad was named 3 times in Global payroll, where Deel led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In global payroll · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Skuad for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Global payroll and employer of recordCore HR and payroll0%57 of 6167%3under 10 labels · led by Deel at 30%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Skuad held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Global payroll · by segment

Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 58 → 45 of 53
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 36 → 45 of 45

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Global payroll0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 58 → 57 of 61

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Skuad across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500011
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00011

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Skuad — Good for mid-market with more reasonable pricing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Global payroll · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“high automation, AI-driven options note they often struggle with hidden fees” Muse Glimmer 30B · Global payroll · negative prompt · soft negative
“Users have reported onboarding problems, payment delays, and support issues” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Global payroll · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Skuad, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Skuad was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Deel7 of 81Not among the top eight
Multiplier7 of 81Not among the top eight
Oyster7 of 80Not among the top eight
Papaya Global6 of 82Not among the top eight
Remote6 of 80Not among the top eight
RemoFirst5 of 81Not among the top eight
Rippling5 of 80Not among the top eight
G-P4 of 81Not among the top eight
Atlas HXM3 of 80Not among the top eight
Native Teams2 of 81Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Skuad. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 8 answers that named Skuad and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

capterra.com4
deel.com4
remote.com4
alcor.com3
employborderless.com3
remotepeople.com3
teamed.global3
trustpilot.com3
wisemonk.io3
asianetnews.com2

Thirty-two of the thirty-two domain citations in answers naming Skuad came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on skuad.io
2,221
subdomains included
Content
596
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
12 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog38102025-03-12Global payroll, HRIS and HCM platforms
Glossary or explainer11502024-12-23Global payroll, HRIS and HCM platforms
Comparison8302025-02-28Global payroll
Template or tool702024-02-22
Case study6undated
Report or ebook2undated
Podcast or video2undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page skuad.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Skuad

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Skuad is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Global HR Platform for Remote Teams
For
businesses everywhere
Price stated
Employees Starts at $199; Contractors Starts at $19 skuad.io
Starting price
Starts at $199 skuad.io
Free plan or trial
Start today, cancel any time. skuad.io/pricing
Integrations claimed
70 skuad.io/pricing
Certifications
authorised by the DNB under the Wet op het financieel toezicht to carry out the business of an electronic-money institutionauthorised by the Financial Conduct Authority under the Electronic Money Regulations 2011 for the issuing of electronic moneySOC 2
Hosting
APACMEAEuropeThe Americas
Customers named
SimwellOpenSolarPureRedVRP ConsultingMicrosense

What Skuad's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: skuad.io, skuad.io/pricing, skuad.io/global-payroll/compliance, skuad.io/platform/manage, skuad.io/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Skuad's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Skuad, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Skuad by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Skuad is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Skuad, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at skuad.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.