Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 13 → 6 of 48
2 categories · RankedNative Teams
20Judge labels
3First choices
3Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Global payroll for small business buyers
Rank 10 of 61 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 29% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business6 of 55
4%11 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market10 of 61
2%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise33 of 47
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In global payroll · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Native Teams for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global payroll and employer of record | Core HR and payroll | 2% | 10 of 61 | 29% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Deel at 30% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| PEO providers | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 21 of 53 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Justworks at 24% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Native Teams held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Global payroll · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 8 → 10 of 53
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 46 → 31 of 45
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global payroll | 4% | 2% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 10 of 61 |
| PEOs | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 21 of 53, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Native Teams across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Native Teams across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained8 labels3
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative5 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Native Teams is the most budget‑friendly employer‑of‑record (EOR) option currently available.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Global payroll · budget prompt · first choice
“If you need the absolute rock-bottom price and your needs are simpler, Native Teams at $99/month is worth exploring.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Global payroll · budget prompt · alternative
“Native Teams starts at $99, and one review calls it the "best-priced" EOR for startups” Perplexity Sonar · Global payroll · budget prompt · alternative
“Native Teams is another excellent budget option.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · PEOs · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Lowest headline price; ranked #1 affordable in some 2026 lists, but verify reliability.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Global payroll · budget prompt · soft negative
“Bare-bones Support: You get what you pay for.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Global payroll · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Native Teams, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Native Teams was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Native Teams, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Native Teams was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Native Teams. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 20 answers that named Native Teams and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
peoplemanagingpeople.com12
teamed.global12
remotepeople.com11
selectsoftwarereviews.com11
playroll.com10
remote.com9
tech.co9
hr.software8
learn.g2.com8
wisemonk.io8
Ninety-eight of the ninety-eight domain citations in answers naming Native Teams came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
nativeteams.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Native Teams takes 2% of first choices and Deel takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
nativeteams.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Native Teams takes 2% of first choices and Deel takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “employer of record”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best employer of record”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 320 a month (“native teams”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 86 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 47,722 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 6,855 · 252 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,645
- Paid Google search
- 7 searches its ads show for, about 26 clicks and $12,206 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 10 of 61 in global payroll
Segment leader
30%
Deel
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 20 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 20 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on nativeteams.com
708
subdomains included
Content
207
counted in the table below
Documentation
348
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Template or tool | 69 | undated | |||
| Blog | 66 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 61 | undated | |||
| Case study | 7 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 4 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page nativeteams.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Native Teams
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Native Teams; a claim can dispute any of them.
Native Teams/Pebl 1
Follow Native Teams
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Native Teams is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Native Teams is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Payments & Employment for International Teams
- For
- international teams
- Price stated
- Employer of Record starts at $99 per employee per month; Contractor of Record starts at $99 per month per contractor; Contractor Pay starts at $19 per contractor per month; Gig Pay custom pricing; Entity Management starts at $149 per month nativeteams.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 19 nativeteams.com/pricing
- Certifications
- GDPRICOPCIISOSOC 2
- Customers named
- TelXiraSemos CloudSturm InternationalMad Head GamesAtrex GroupHypefyMaincedevIT Team
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Native Teams's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: nativeteams.com, nativeteams.com/pricing, nativeteams.com/compliance, nativeteams.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Native Teams's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Native Teams, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Native Teams by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Native Teams is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Native Teams, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.