Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 30 → 48 of 48
2 categories · RankedG-P
63Judge labels
12First choices
16Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
23% in Global payroll for enterprise buyers
Rank 52 of 61 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 44% of its 16 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of G-P →By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
Small business55 of 55
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market52 of 61
0%16 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise1 of 47
23%36 labels
accepted challenger
In global payroll · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named G-P for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global payroll and employer of record | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 52 of 61 | 44% | 16 | criticized challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Payroll software | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 31 of 58 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 20% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, G-P held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Global payroll · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 10 → 44 of 53
Enterprise▲+5Since September 2026: 16% → 21%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
21%from 16% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 3 → 1 of 45
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global payroll | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 52 of 61 |
| Payroll software | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 31 of 58, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated G-P across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated G-P across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct18 labels8
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative15 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained8 labels4
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative19 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative63 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 15 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“G-P is often considered when scale and global employment structure matter more than price” GPT-5.4 mini · Global payroll · direct prompt · alternative
“commonly included in top EOR shortlists for enterprise/global employment use cases” Perplexity Sonar · Global payroll · comparative prompt · alternative
“If you need high-touch, concierge support for complex hires → G-P” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Global payroll · direct prompt · alternative
“consider Deel or G-P for their global payroll capabilities” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Payroll software · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“written feedback reveals repeated concerns about onboarding, payroll handling, pricing clarity, and support consistency” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Global payroll · negative prompt · soft negative
“High Cost & Rigid Contracts: G-P is significantly more expensive... making them a poor fit for early-stage startups” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Global payroll · negative prompt · soft negative
“some of those themes appearing around providers like Remote, G-P, RemotePeople, and some others” GPT-5.4 mini · Global payroll · negative prompt · soft negative
“The pricing model lacks transparency and carries the highest cost in the global EOR market” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Global payroll · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as G-P, over the 63 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and G-P was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as G-P, over the 63 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and G-P was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named G-P. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 62 of the 63 answers that named G-P and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
teamed.global27
alcor.com25
deel.com25
g2.com22
wisemonk.io22
pin.com20
remote.com20
peoplemanagingpeople.com17
playroll.com16
rippling.com16
210 of the 210 domain citations in answers naming G-P came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
globalization-partners.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, G-P takes 0% of first choices and Deel takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
globalization-partners.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, G-P takes 0% of first choices and Deel takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “employer of record”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best employer of record”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 110,000 a month (“g-p”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 11,471 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 16,514 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,375 · 423 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 4,885
- Paid Google search
- 316 searches its ads show for, about 3,758 clicks and $302,233 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 52 of 61 in global payroll
Segment leader
30%
Deel
- First choices
- 12 across its categories
- Named in
- 63 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 62 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on globalization-partners.com
34,299
subdomains included
Content
4,624
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 8
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 1,752 | undated | Global payroll | ||
| Blog | 1,672 | 0 | 2025-11-17 | Global payroll, Compensation management | |
| Case study | 240 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 234 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 198 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 132 | undated | Workforce planning, HRIS and HCM platforms | ||
| Comparison | 120 | undated | Global payroll | ||
| Podcast or video | 102 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 96 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 78 | undated | Global payroll |
Most recent
- 2025-11-17Top global hiring challenges for hr managers blog
- 2025-11-17Top global hiring challenges for hr managers blog
- 2025-10-27Eor stock equity compensation global employees blog
- 2025-10-27Eor stock equity compensation global employees blog
- 2025-09-19Top 6 southeast asian countries for international expansion blog
- 2025-09-19Top 6 southeast asian countries for international expansion blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- June 11, 2026Gartner UK & Ireland CHRO Community Executive SummitRoyal Lancaster London, London · spoke
- October 28, 2025未來的 人力資源領導者：科技與人工智慧如何改寫人力資源的劇本展覽展示廳 · spoke
- October 27, 2025 to October 29, 2025Gartner 人力資源研討會 2025place not stated · sponsored
As the event pages on globalization-partners.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page globalization-partners.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as G-P
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as G-P; a claim can dispute any of them.
G-P (Globalization Partners) 5Globalization Partners 3Globalization Partners (G-P) 3G-P (GlobalProfessional) 1
Follow G-P
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
G-P is its own company.ShowHide
The company
G-P is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Global Employment Platform
- For
- companies looking to operate globally
- Price stated
- Starting at USD 599 per employee/month; Starting at USD 39 per contractor/month; Starting at USD 500 per seat/month globalization-partners.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 39 globalization-partners.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- The 14-day free trial of G-P Gia includes unlimited queries and expert workflows, along with advanced AI document creation and custom data upload — plus trial-exclusive access to compliance monitoring. globalization-partners.com/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 200 globalization-partners.com/partners
- Certifications
- ISO/IEC 42001
- Customers named
- Boston DynamicsFeedzaiRepsolKraft Group & AffiliatesOneStream SoftwareAvionicaSeeq CorporationEdpuzzle
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What G-P's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: globalization-partners.com, globalization-partners.com/pricing, globalization-partners.com/security, globalization-partners.com/customers, globalization-partners.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when G-P's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as G-P, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for G-P by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where G-P is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name G-P, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.