Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 25 of 50, unchanged
Seismic · 1 category · Named, not rankedSeismic Learning
4Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Seismic Learning was named 1 time in Learning management syst, where TalentLMS led with 51%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business27 of 52
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market42 of 61
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise26 of 72
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In learning management syst · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Seismic Learning for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning management systems | Learning and development | 0% | 42 of 61 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 51% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Seismic Learning held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Learning management syst · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 37 → 39 of 55
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 37 → 24 of 65
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning management syst | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 37 → 42 of 61 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Seismic Learning across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Seismic Learning across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Seismic Learning, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Seismic Learning was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Seismic Learning, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Seismic Learning was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Seismic Learning. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 4 answers that named Seismic Learning and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
goskills.com2
selecthub.com2
360learning.com1
capterra.co.uk1
cubite.io1
d2l.com1
docebo.com1
educate-me.co1
eleapsoftware.com1
elearningindustry.com1
Twelve of the twelve domain citations in answers naming Seismic Learning came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
seismic.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Seismic Learning takes 0% of first choices and TalentLMS takes 51%.ShowHide
Search and answers
seismic.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Seismic Learning takes 0% of first choices and TalentLMS takes 51%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “lms for employee training”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “learning management systems”
–
not in the top ten
- Its company's site
- seismic.com shared with Seismic's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 35,447 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,051 · 395 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 6,312
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 42 of 61 in learning management syst
Segment leader
51%
TalentLMS
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 4 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 3 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Follow Seismic Learning
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Seismic is the company behind Seismic Learning.ShowHide
The company
Seismic is the company behind Seismic Learning.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- A powerful sales readiness solution that onboards, upskills, and improves performance with personalized, scalable learning.
- For
- sales teams
- Customers named
- OneSource VirtualScorpionJostensFlock SafetyAlera GroupPleoIBMFreshworks
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Seismic Learning's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: seismic.com/platform/learning, seismic.com, trust.seismic.com, seismic.com/platform, seismic.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Seismic Learning's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Seismic Learning, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Seismic Learning by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Seismic Learning is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Seismic Learning, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.