Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 17 of 61, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedCoassemble
25Judge labels
2First choices
2Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Coassemble was named 5 times in Compliance training, where Traliant led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business8 of 65
2%7 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market12 of 92
2%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In compliance training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Coassemble for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance training | Learning and development | 2% | 12 of 92 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Traliant at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Coassemble held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Compliance training · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 of 89, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance training | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 12 of 92, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Coassemble across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Coassemble across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained9 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative5 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“such as SC Training or Coassemble, which offer straightforward programs and are budget-friendly” Llama 4 Maverick · Compliance training · budget prompt · first choice
“worth a look if you want a simple all-in-one learning platform and can tolerate custom pricing” GPT-5.4 mini · Compliance training · budget prompt · alternative
“TalentLMS and Coassemble offer scalable solutions as your company grows” Mistral Small · Compliance training · budget prompt · alternative
“Offers affordable monthly plans starting at $50 per month” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Compliance training · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Coassemble, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Coassemble was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Coassemble, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Coassemble was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Coassemble. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 25 answers that named Coassemble and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
firsthr.app12
goskills.com12
thinkific.com11
ispring.com10
continu.com9
knowlify.com9
talentlms.com9
expertinsights.com7
g2.com7
capterra.com6
Ninety-two of the ninety-two domain citations in answers naming Coassemble came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
coassemble.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Coassemble takes 2% of first choices and Traliant takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
coassemble.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Coassemble takes 2% of first choices and Traliant takes 22%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “compliance training platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “compliance training providers”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,300 a month (“coassemble”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 12 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,375 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 589 · 40 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,538
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 12 of 92 in compliance training
Segment leader
22%
Traliant
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 25 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 25 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on coassemble.com
338
subdomains included
Content
281
counted in the table below
Documentation
10
Product · Integration
11 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 230 | 6 | 2026-08-26 | Learning management syst, Course authoring tools | |
| Template or tool | 28 | 0 | 2026-04-29 | Employee onboarding | |
| Glossary or explainer | 12 | 1 | 2026-08-12 | Learning experience plat | |
| Comparison | 6 | 1 | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Case study | 5 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-01Build vs buy headless learning infrastructure comparison
- 2026-08-26Learning platforms ai agents mcp blog
- 2026-08-24Best white label lms for embedding blog
- 2026-08-24Developer tools adding learning content app blog
- 2026-08-12What is a learning experience platform glossary or explainer
- 2026-08-11Guide headless authoring embedded learning blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page coassemble.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Coassemble
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Coassemble is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Coassemble is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The API-first training platform.
- For
- teams who build
- Price stated
- Plans from $2,500/yr coassemble.com
- Starting price
- 2500 coassemble.com
- Free plan or trial
- free sandbox coassemble.com
- Integrations claimed
- 6 coassemble.com/pricing
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IISOC 2 Type 1SOC 2 Type 2SOC 2SOC 2 Type 2 compliance
- Hosting
- EUUSAPACMulti-region
- Customers named
- GamesightHacktifyCitrinexAureus FinancialInstructional Design CentralRegional Academies of Sport
What Coassemble's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: coassemble.com, coassemble.com/pricing, trust.coassemble.com, coassemble.com/platform/share, coassemble.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Coassemble's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Coassemble, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Coassemble by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Coassemble is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Coassemble, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.