Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 39 of 67, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedSapia.ai
13Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Sapia.ai was named 4 times in Interview scheduling and 1 other category, where Calendly led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business41 of 69
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market37 of 75
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise38 of 75
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In interview scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Sapia.ai for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interview scheduling | Talent acquisition | 0% | 37 of 75 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 20% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Talent intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 32 of 90 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Pin at 27% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Sapia.ai held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Interview scheduling · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 34 → 35 of 73
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 37 of 72, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interview scheduling | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 34 → 37 of 75 |
| Talent intelligence | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 59 → 32 of 90 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Sapia.ai across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Sapia.ai across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 label1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 label1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for: Structured chat interviews at volume, with built-in self-scheduling for first interviews.” Mistral Small · Interview scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative
“these process-intelligence tools use AI to record, analyze, and grade structured interviews” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Talent intelligence · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Sapia.ai, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sapia.ai was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Sapia.ai, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sapia.ai was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sapia.ai. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named Sapia.ai and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
sapia.aiYour site12
learn.g2.com5
peoplemanagingpeople.com5
cal.com4
eightfold.ai4
joveo.com4
pin.com4
koalendar.com3
lever.co3
metaview.ai3
Thirty-five of the forty-seven domain citations in answers naming Sapia.ai came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on sapia.ai
920
subdomains included
Content
613
counted in the table below
Documentation
115
Product · Integration
37 · 10
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 377 | 21 | 2026-09-23 | Talent intelligence, Video interviewing | |
| Report or ebook | 149 | 0 | 2026-06-24 | ||
| Case study | 49 | 1 | 2026-07-17 | ||
| Conference or event | 10 | 8 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| Comparison | 10 | 0 | 2026-01-29 | Candidate assessment | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 8 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 5 | 0 | 2026-06-27 | Applicant tracking syste | |
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2026-01-20 | ||
| Podcast or video | 2 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23Ai based interview platform blog
- 2026-09-23Automated interview scheduler top platforms blog
- 2026-09-22Ai hiring assistant software guide blog
- 2026-09-22Ai sourcing tools for recruiting blog
- 2026-09-21Ai candidate assessment software blog
- 2026-09-20Diversity hiring blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page sapia.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Sapia.ai
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Sapia.ai; a claim can dispute any of them.
Sapia 1
Follow Sapia.ai
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Sapia.ai is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Sapia.ai is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI Interview Platform for Enterprise Hiring
- For
- enterprise hiring
- Certifications
- ISO/IEC 42001ISO/IEC 27018GDPRSOC 2 Type 2ISO/IEC 27017ISO/IEC 27001ISO 27001:2022ISO 27017:2015
- Hosting
- AustraliaIrelandUS
- Customers named
- Holland & BarrettDavid JonesSpark NZRegis Aged Care GroupLondon GatwickQantasLinkedInBosch
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations
What Sapia.ai's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: sapia.ai, trust.sapia.ai, sapia.ai/platform, sapia.ai/customer-stories, sapia.ai/products/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sapia.ai's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sapia.ai, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sapia.ai by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Sapia.ai is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Sapia.ai, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.