| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning management systems | Learning and development | 6% | 5 of 61 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 51% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Compliance training | Learning and development | 4% | 9 of 92 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Traliant at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now. |
| Course authoring tools | Learning and development | 2% | 16 of 82 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Articulate 360 at 30% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Online course libraries | Learning and development | 0% | 19 of 95 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 48% | ▼−8Since September 2026: 8% → 0%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Coaching platforms | Learning and development | 0% | 42 of 128 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 20% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Learning experience platforms | Learning and development | 0% | 36 of 89 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by 360Learning at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Online course libraries | 8% | 0% | ▼−8Since September 2026: 8% → 0%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 19 of 95 |
| Compliance training | 0% | 4% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now. | New this edition | Rank 9 of 92, unchanged |
| Learning management syst | 2% | 6% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 5 of 61 |
| Course authoring tools | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 16 of 82 |
| Coaching platforms | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 34 → 42 of 128 |
| Learning experience plat | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 30 → 36 of 89 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Start with the free tier of TalentLMS, Zoho Learn, ProProfs Training Maker, or Coursebox” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Learning management syst · budget prompt · first choice
“A popular choice for mid-market teams, it's built specifically for B2B LMS needs.” Llama 4 Maverick · Course authoring tools · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Some of the top options include BizLibrary, TechClass, and ProProfs Training.” Llama 4 Maverick · Compliance training · direct prompt · first choice
“The best LMS ... is TalentLMS, ProProfs Training Maker, or GoSkills.” Llama 4 Maverick · Learning management syst · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 46 of the 46 answers that named ProProfs Training Maker and are not a share of its labels.
135 of the 174 domain citations in answers naming ProProfs Training Maker came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 344 | 3 | 2026-09-04 | ||
| Comparison | 58 | 9 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Case study | 57 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 23 | 0 | 2024-04-22 | ||
| Template or tool | 18 | 0 | 2021-12-14 | ||
| Report or ebook | 2 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 1 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2023-07-11 |
Every page proprofstraining.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What ProProfs Training Maker's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: proprofstraining.com, proprofstraining.com/pricing, proprofstraining.com/features, proprofstraining.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ProProfs Training Maker's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ProProfs Training Maker, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ProProfs Training Maker by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: