AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Workforce planning and analytics › Org charts › Organimi vs Pingboard
Org charts and org design · October 2026 Edition

Organimi vs Pingboard

One of fourteen models named Organimi first on the direct prompt; four named Pingboard. Organimi was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Pingboard by thirteen and Organimi carries 43 labels and Pingboard 36, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Organimi

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Pingboard

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share9%8%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%8%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#3A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels4336A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Organimi reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ChartHop was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. ChartHop vs Organimi · ChartHop vs Pingboard · Organimi vs Creately

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
OrganimiFirst choices, of fourteen modelsPingboard
Direct14
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained401 against Pingboard
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against Organimi · 2 against Pingboard
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Organimi and Pingboard were named in the same answer sixty times, of the 112 answers naming Organimi and the 97 naming Pingboard. In those answers Pingboard took the first choice seven times and Organimi sixteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Organimi and Pingboard stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Organimi Pingboard first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Organimi on the left and Pingboard on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Organimi and Pingboard stood in it.

Organimi first, Pingboard not the choice

1 of 14 modelsPingboard was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-6 LunaOrganimi alternatives: ChartHop, OrgChart

Pingboard first, Organimi an alternative

4 of 14 modelsOrganimi was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Grok 4.1 FastPingboard alternatives: Lucidchart, Organimi
Mistral SmallOrgChartHub, Pingboard alternatives: Arbor, Ingentis org.manager, Organimi
Kimi K2Pingboard alternatives: ChartHop, Lucidchart, Organimi
Muse Glimmer 30BPingboard alternatives: ChartHop, OneDirectory, OrgChartHub, Organimi

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5OneDirectory alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChart, Organimi
GPT-5.4 miniChartHop alternatives: OrgChart, Pingboard
Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop alternatives: HiBob, Organimi, Rippling, Sift, TeamOhana
Perplexity SonarOrgChart alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChartHub, Organimi
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChart, Pingboard, The Org
GLM 4.7 FlashXChartHop alternatives: BambooHR, Organimi, Pingboard
MiniMax M2.5ChartHop alternatives: OneDirectory, OrgChart, Pingboard, Sift

Neither was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashLuminal alternatives: BambooHR, BetterU, Lucidchart, Rippling

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Organimi leads by twenty-one points.
Organimi32%#1 of 15
Pingboard11%#4 of 15
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Organimi leads by two points.
Organimi9%#2 of 13
Pingboard8%#3 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Organimi leads by two points.
Organimi2%#9 of 15
Pingboard0%#11 of 15
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Organimi

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Tools reliant on infrequent data syncs (e.g., import-only like some tiers of Organimi or Monday.com)” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Organimi has data integration issues and is not as scalable as other options” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Organimi at ~$20/mo for up to 150 employees is frequently cited as the affordable dedicated option” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd start with Organimi Premium for a typical mid-market B2B company” GPT-6 Luna · direct prompt · first choice
“Organimi is notable for being completely free for up to 25 users” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Pingboard

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Avoid per-employee pricing models (like ChartHop or Pingboard) if you're budget-constrained” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Clunky org chart interface — users describe it as "a little hairy" with multiple team members” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Be cautious about: Pingboard (and similar mid-tier tools with manual quirks)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Pingboard is frequently picked for growing and mid-size orgs that need governable org-chart changes with admin workflows and integrations.” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“Go with Pingboard if you want the best balance of automation, employee experience, and reasonable pricing” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Pingboard (often rated best overall for mid-market)” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.