Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 30 → 28 of 77
1 category · Named, not rankedPeopleHum
6Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. PeopleHum was named 2 times in People analytics, where Crunchr led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business32 of 81
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market15 of 114
2%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In people analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named PeopleHum for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 2% | 15 of 114 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, PeopleHum held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · People analytics · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 17 → 12 of 101
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People analytics | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 17 → 15 of 114 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated PeopleHum across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated PeopleHum across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained5 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“peopleHum – *Best overall value for deep analytics*” DeepSeek V4 Flash · People analytics · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PeopleHum, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PeopleHum was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PeopleHum, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PeopleHum was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PeopleHum. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named PeopleHum and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
everhour.com5
peoplemanagingpeople.com5
selectsoftwarereviews.com5
currentware.com4
dupple.com4
personio.com4
g2.com3
hrcloud.com3
leapsome.com3
ordio.com3
Thirty-nine of the thirty-nine domain citations in answers naming PeopleHum came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on peoplehum.com
2,927
subdomains included
Content
2,152
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,339 | 87 | 2026-09-28 | Performance management, Applicant tracking syste | |
| Glossary or explainer | 663 | 1 | 2026-08-03 | Performance management, Background screening | |
| Report or ebook | 81 | 0 | 2026-02-11 | People analytics, Workforce planning | |
| Comparison | 42 | 0 | 2026-06-29 | Payroll software, People analytics | |
| Template or tool | 20 | 1 | 2026-07-13 | Employee onboarding | |
| Conference or event | 4 | 0 | 2025-12-23 | ||
| Case study | 2 | 0 | 2025-11-01 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Why the annual review is workplace theatre nobody believes in blog
- 2026-09-28Your manager isn t watching you but the algorithm is blog
- 2026-09-24Orchestrate ai agents dont manage processes blog
- 2026-09-23Multi agent networks turn five day sign offs into five second actions blog
- 2026-09-23The cost of human gatekeepers in ai workflows blog
- 2026-09-22Agentic workflows annihilate the 9 to 5 workplace paradigm blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page peoplehum.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name performance management (23); 8 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as PeopleHum
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as PeopleHum; a claim can dispute any of them.
peopleHum 1
Follow PeopleHum
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
PeopleHum is its own company.ShowHide
The company
PeopleHum is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- All in one HR software to simplify your HR processes
- For
- businesses
- Price stated
- 2.00 USD peoplehum.com
- Starting price
- 2.00 peoplehum.com
- Free plan or trial
- Try it for free!; Free trial; 7 days. No strings attached. No credit card required. peoplehum.com
- Certifications
- ISO/IEC 27001ISO 27001SSAE18FEDRAMPPCI DSS Level 1
- Customers named
- AcornSpearhead ManagementMediaAgilityiZootoGerentAccess MedicalBlibliGreen Africa
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What PeopleHum's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: peoplehum.com, peoplehum.com, peoplehum.com/pricing, peoplehum.com/security, peoplehum.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PeopleHum's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PeopleHum, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PeopleHum by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where PeopleHum is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name PeopleHum, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.