Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 27 → 19 of 88
4 categories · RankedPeoplebox
28Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Succession planning for mid-market buyers
Rank 9 of 93 in the mid-market standing
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business19 of 91
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market9 of 93
4%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In succession planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Peoplebox for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 4% | 9 of 93 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 28% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 31 of 114 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Coaching platforms | Learning and development | 0% | 88 of 128 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 20% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Goals and OKRs | Performance and talent management | 0% | 47 of 68 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Perdoo at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Peoplebox held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Succession planning · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 44 → 8 of 87
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Succession planning | 0% | 4% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 44 → 9 of 93 |
| People analytics | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 31 of 114, unchanged |
| Coaching platforms | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 88 of 128, unchanged |
| Goals and OKRs | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 29 → 47 of 68 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Peoplebox across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Peoplebox across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels1
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative10 labelsNone
Budget-constrained7 labelsNone
Scale-constrained5 labels1
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative28 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Peoplebox is highly recommended for SMBs and mid-market companies wanting succession alongside performance, engagement, and learning without enterprise pricing” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Succession planning · direct prompt · first choice
“or Peoplebox (an AI-native talent platform great for mid-market teams that links OKRs, performance, and succession)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Succession planning · scale prompt · first choice
“more operational and manager-facing than a heavy enterprise analytics suite” GPT-5.4 mini · People analytics · comparative prompt · alternative
“or Peoplebox at ~$7/user/month” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Succession planning · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Peoplebox, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Peoplebox was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Peoplebox, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Peoplebox was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Peoplebox. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 28 answers that named Peoplebox and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
firsthr.app13
peoplebox.aiYour site13
peoplemanagingpeople.com13
talentguard.com10
workhuman.com10
okrstool.com8
g2.com7
softwareadvice.com7
tability.io7
capterra.com6
Eighty-one of the ninety-four domain citations in answers naming Peoplebox came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
peoplebox.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Peoplebox takes 4% of first choices and Lattice takes 28%.ShowHide
Search and answers
peoplebox.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Peoplebox takes 4% of first choices and Lattice takes 28%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “succession planning tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “succession planning software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 210 a month (“peoplebox”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 6 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 15,519 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 8,319 · 96 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,152
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 9 of 93 in succession planning
Segment leader
28%
Lattice
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 28 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 28 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on peoplebox.ai
724
subdomains included
Content
652
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 583 | 12 | 2026-09-22 | Performance management, People analytics | |
| Comparison | 31 | 1 | 2026-09-07 | Performance management | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 11 | 0 | 2025-03-11 | ||
| Case study | 7 | 0 | 2025-02-26 | Performance management | |
| Glossary or explainer | 7 | 0 | 2025-12-22 | ||
| Template or tool | 5 | 0 | 2025-12-26 | Goals and OKRs, Employee onboarding | |
| Report or ebook | 4 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 3 | 0 | 2024-04-25 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-22Best talent management software blog
- 2026-09-17Quarterly business review template for hr blog
- 2026-09-09How ai is changing restaurant hiring blog
- 2026-09-07Ai tools hr teams blog
- 2026-09-07Lattice alternative comparison
- 2026-09-01Performance review form blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page peoplebox.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name performance management (39); 18 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Peoplebox
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Peoplebox is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Peoplebox is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-powered Talent platform that combines human-like AI with configurable workflows to automate hiring, performance management, and employee growth.
- For
- HR teams
- Price stated
- Pricing is based on employee count and which modules you use. Contact us for a custom quote based on your team size and needs. peoplebox.ai
- Starting price
- 0 peoplebox.ai
- Free plan or trial
- You can talk to Nova right now: select a role above and you’ll get a call in 60 seconds. For the talent management platform, book a demo and we’ll show you how it works with your specific use cases. peoplebox.ai
- Certifications
- SOC 2 compliant
- Customers named
- RazorpayKPMGPropel SchoolKhatabookNova BenefitsHindsiteAHCLUla
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What Peoplebox's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: peoplebox.ai, peoplebox.ai, peoplebox.ai/pricing, peoplebox.ai/case-studies, peoplebox.ai/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Peoplebox's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Peoplebox, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Peoplebox by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Peoplebox is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Peoplebox, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.