HR AI Index

Index › Products › PageUp Clinch · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

PageUp Clinch

2Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

1 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. PageUp Clinch was named 1 time in Recruitment marketing, where Teamtailor led with 23%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market62 of 104

under the label threshold

Enterprise29 of 78

under the label threshold

In recruitment marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named PageUp Clinch for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Recruitment marketing and career sites	Talent acquisition	0%	62 of 104	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 23%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for PageUp Clinch yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated PageUp Clinch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	1	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as PageUp Clinch, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PageUp Clinch was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Phenom2 of 21Not among the top eight

Beamery2 of 20Not among the top eight

Radancy2 of 20Not among the top eight

Symphony Talent2 of 20Not among the top eight

Appcast1 of 20Not among the top eight

Avature1 of 20Not among the top eight

Avature CRM1 of 20Not among the top eight

iCIMS Candidate Experience Management1 of 20Not among the top eight

iCIMS Employer Branding1 of 20Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PageUp Clinch. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named PageUp Clinch and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

avature.net2

beamery.com2

icims.com2

pageuppeople.comYour site2

phenom.com2

radancy.com2

symphonytalent.com2

appcast.io1

gartner.com1

zoomforth.com1

Fifteen of the seventeen domain citations in answers naming PageUp Clinch came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

pageuppeople.com/products/recruitment-marketing2

phenom.com/talent-marketers2

symphonytalent.com/2

appcast.io/1

avature.net/candidate-relationship-management1

avature.net/career-sites1

beamery.com/platform/talent-acquisition/talent-marketing1

beamery.com/solutions/candidate-engagement/index.html1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

pageuppeople.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, PageUp Clinch takes 0% of first choices and Teamtailor takes 23%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “recruitment marketing platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “recruitment marketing platforms”

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 62 of 104 in recruitment marketing

Segment leader

23%

Teamtailor

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 2 answers
Its own site cited: in 2 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on pageuppeople.com

922

subdomains included

Content

301

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

15 · 181

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	109	0	2025-05-15	Applicant tracking syste
News or press	69	3	2026-09-15	Background screening
Case study	63	undated
Report or ebook	25	2	2026-08-10
Webinar or virtual event	24	0	2020-09-10	Pay equity
Glossary or explainer	10	0	2024-04-08
Template or tool	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-152026 top hr product of the year by hr executive news or press
2026-09-08Certification for artificial intelligence management systems news or press
2026-08-27Pageup and sapia ai embed intelligent ai interviewing directly into enterprise hiring workflows news or press
2026-08-10Ebook the hidden cost and impact of disconnected hr tech systems research report or ebook
2026-08-05Ebook the state of construction hiring in australia market analysis report or ebook
2026-06-30Pageup launches paige news or press

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page pageuppeople.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow PageUp Clinch

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

PageUp Clinch is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Less sourcing. More hiring. Attract top talent with intelligent career sites and recruitment CRM. Source smarter, build talent pools effortlessly, and keep candidates engaged.
pageuppeople.com
For: talent acquisition
pageuppeople.com
Integrations claimed: 150 pageuppeople.com
Customers named: Camp AustraliaSportsbet.comBP RetailUniversity of Wisonsin MadisonUniversity of DelawareKierMitieNokia
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, certifications, hosting

What PageUp Clinch's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: pageuppeople.com, trust.pageuppeople.com, pageuppeople.com/solutions/retail, pageuppeople.com/marketplace. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PageUp Clinch's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PageUp Clinch, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PageUp Clinch by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where PageUp Clinch is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name PageUp Clinch, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.