Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 17 → 26 of 69
1 category · Named, not rankedOrg Chart Studio
8Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Org Chart Studio was named 4 times in Org charts, where ChartHop led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business22 of 72
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market23 of 95
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise55 of 86
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In org charts · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Org Chart Studio for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Org charts and org design | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 23 of 95 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 30% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Org Chart Studio held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Org charts · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 15 → 22 of 90
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 36 → 49 of 80
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Org charts | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 23 of 95 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Org Chart Studio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Org Chart Studio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Provides a free tier supporting up to 10 charts with 250 people each.” Mistral Small · Org charts · budget prompt · alternative
“free up to 10 org charts with 100 people each, no credit card” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Org charts · budget prompt · alternative
“Org Chart Studio ($1 export passes)” Kimi K2 · Org charts · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Org Chart Studio, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Org Chart Studio was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Org Chart Studio, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Org Chart Studio was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Org Chart Studio. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named Org Chart Studio and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
firsthr.app6
orgchartstudio.comYour site6
cogniver.com4
theorg.com4
theorgchart.com4
anywherer.com3
creately.com3
forbes.com3
onedirectory.com3
softwaresuggest.com3
Thirty-three of the thirty-nine domain citations in answers naming Org Chart Studio came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
orgchartstudio.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Org Chart Studio takes 0% of first choices and ChartHop takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
orgchartstudio.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Org Chart Studio takes 0% of first choices and ChartHop takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “org chart tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “org chart software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 10 a month (“org chart studio”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 428 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 293 · 0 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 165
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 23 of 95 in org charts
Segment leader
30%
ChartHop
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 8 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 8 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on orgchartstudio.com
81
subdomains included
Content
59
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 52 | 31 | 2026-09-19 | Org charts | |
| Comparison | 7 | 0 | 2026-06-16 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-19How to change org chart colors blog
- 2026-09-13How to use org chart studio agent api blog
- 2026-09-12Account data and support help blog
- 2026-09-12Flat organizations still have hierarchies blog
- 2026-09-12How to add edit delete people blog
- 2026-09-12How to build org chart from gusto blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page orgchartstudio.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Org Chart Studio
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Org Chart Studio; a claim can dispute any of them.
Org Chart Studio (free tier) 1
Follow Org Chart Studio
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Org Chart Studio is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Org Chart Studio is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Free org chart maker
- For
- teams
- Price stated
- Free $0 Watermarked PNG. 1-Day $1 one-time. 7-Day $5 one-time. 30-Day $10 one-time. Annual $100 one-time. orgchartstudio.com
- Starting price
- 0 orgchartstudio.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free forever for core editing; free watermarked PNG exports through 250 people; CSV stays free. orgchartstudio.com
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Org Chart Studio's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: orgchartstudio.com, orgchartstudio.com/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Org Chart Studio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Org Chart Studio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Org Chart Studio by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Org Chart Studio is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Org Chart Studio, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.