Small business▲+9Since September 2026: 4% → 13%, +9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
13%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 6 → 4 of 69
1 category · Rankeddraw.io
40Judge labels
13First choices
7Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
13% in Org charts for small business buyers
Rank 2 of 95 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business3 of 72
13%28 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market2 of 95
11%9 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise82 of 86
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In org charts · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named draw.io for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Org charts and org design | Workforce planning and analytics | 11% | 2 of 95 | 0% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 30% | ▲+5Since September 2026: 8% → 13%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, draw.io held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Org charts · by segment
Mid-market▲+5Since September 2026: 8% → 13%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
13%from 8% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 5 → 2 of 90
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 79 → 76 of 80
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Org charts | 8% | 13% | ▲+5Since September 2026: 8% → 13%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 2 of 95 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated draw.io across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated draw.io across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained16 labels13
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative7 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative40 labels in all, every segment counted; 13 of the 14 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“draw.io (now diagrams.net) stands out as the best org chart software for a company on a limited budget.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Org charts · budget prompt · first choice
“Draw.io for complete free access or Creately for a low-cost paid option are strong choices” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Org charts · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose draw.io if you have $0 budget and don't mind building the chart layout manually.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Org charts · budget prompt · first choice
“If you want completely free and simple, go with draw.io.” Mistral Small · Org charts · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as draw.io, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and draw.io was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as draw.io, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and draw.io was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named draw.io. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 38 of the 40 answers that named draw.io and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
firsthr.app25
forbes.com23
creately.com17
theorg.com15
venngage.com15
learn.g2.com13
g2.com12
orgchartstudio.com12
cogniver.com10
connecteam.com10
152 of the 152 domain citations in answers naming draw.io came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
drawio.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, draw.io takes 11% of first choices and ChartHop takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
drawio.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, draw.io takes 11% of first choices and ChartHop takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “org chart tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “org chart software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 90,500 a month (“draw.io”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1,096 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 141,930 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,620 · 1,000 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 5,573
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
11%
rank 2 of 95 in org charts
Segment leader
30%
ChartHop
- First choices
- 13 across its categories
- Named in
- 40 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 38 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on drawio.com
613
subdomains included
Content
63
counted in the table below
Documentation
511
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 56 | 8 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Comparison | 4 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 3 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Custom link actions blog
- 2026-09-17Sharepoint diagram editor blog
- 2026-09-10Updated gliffy import blog
- 2026-08-18Layout shapes blog
- 2026-08-04Updated generate blog
- 2026-07-17Configuration dialog blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page drawio.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as draw.io
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as draw.io; a claim can dispute any of them.
draw.io (Diagrams.net) 3Draw.io 1Draw.io (Diagrams.net) 1Draw.io (diagrams.net) 1draw.io (diagrams.net) 1draw.io (now diagrams.net) 1
Follow draw.io
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
draw.io is its own company.ShowHide
The company
draw.io is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Security-first diagramming for teams
- For
- teams
- Price stated
- Free forever drawio.com
- Starting price
- null drawio.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free forever • No sign-up required drawio.com
- Integrations claimed
- 6 drawio.com
- Certifications
- Open SourceApache 2.0 License
- Hosting
- UK
- Customers named
- Google DriveOneDriveGitHubGitLabDropboxGoogle WorkspaceClassroomGoogle Docs
What draw.io's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: drawio.com, drawio.com/trust, drawio.com/docs/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when draw.io's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as draw.io, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for draw.io by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where draw.io is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name draw.io, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where draw.io is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where draw.io is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHidedraw.io is among the products AI models recommend first in Org charts and org design this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.