Every category where a model named Monitask for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Employee monitoring	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	26 of 75	14%	7	under 10 labels · led by ActivTrak at 33%
People analytics	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	94 of 114	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22%
Performance management	Performance and talent management	0%	78 of 85	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 43%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Monitask yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Monitask across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	1	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative10 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“keystroke loggers, and screenshot-taking tools (such as Hubstaff, Monitask, or Teramind)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Performance management · negative prompt · hard negative

“Treat those as enhanced-due-diligence flags, not a finding that each vendor broke the law” GPT-6 Luna · People analytics · negative prompt · soft negative

“Specific Platforms to Be Cautious About ... Monitask” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Employee monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Monitask, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Monitask was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Hubstaff24 of 304Not among the top eight

Time Doctor16 of 300Not among the top eight

ActivTrak15 of 302Not among the top eight

Teramind15 of 302Not among the top eight

Apploye13 of 304Not among the top eight

Insightful13 of 301Not among the top eight

DeskTime12 of 301Not among the top eight

Clockify6 of 302Not among the top eight

Controlio6 of 301Not among the top eight

Buddy Punch5 of 300Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Monitask. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 30 answers that named Monitask and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

currentware.com22

forbes.com17

jibble.io16

insightful.io14

peoplemanagingpeople.com14

tmetric.com13

employee-monitoring.net10

fitsmallbusiness.com9

learn.g2.com9

worktime.com9

133 of the 133 domain citations in answers naming Monitask came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

currentware.com/blog/best-employee-monitoring-software22

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-employee-monitoring-software16

jibble.io/best-employee-monitoring-software15

tmetric.com/best-software/best-employee-monitoring-software13

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-employee-monitoring-software11

fitsmallbusiness.com/employee-monitoring-software9

insightful.io/blog/employee-activity-monitoring-tools-compared9

learn.g2.com/best-employee-monitoring-software9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

monitask.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Monitask takes 0% of first choices and ActivTrak takes 33%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “employee monitoring tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “employee monitoring tools”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 720 a month (“monitask”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 10 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 22,971 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 14,827 · 117 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 3,311
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

16 ads · 15 text, 1 image · 4 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2025, as Ruslan Askarov, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 2 in the year, 14 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 26 of 75 in employee monitoring

Segment leader

33%

ActivTrak

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 30 answers
Its own site cited: in 30 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on monitask.com

2,473

subdomains included

Content

617

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	562	16	2026-09-26	Employee onboarding, Workforce management sui
Comparison	30	undated
Glossary or explainer	10	undated
Template or tool	9	0	2024-01-01
Report or ebook	4	undated
Webinar or virtual event	1	undated
Podcast or video	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-26Attendance sheet blog
2026-09-26Fte meaning blog
2026-09-25How many work days in a year blog
2026-09-25How many work weeks in a year blog
2026-09-24How many hours in a month blog
2026-09-24How many hours worked in a year blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page monitask.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Monitask

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Monitask is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Employee monitoring and time tracking software
monitask.com
For: office and remote teams
monitask.com
Price stated: Paid plans with full monitoring, reports and integrations start at $6.49 per user/month, billed annually. monitask.com
Starting price: 6.49 monitask.com
Free plan or trial: Free plan and 10-day free trial, no credit card required. monitask.com
Integrations claimed: 1000 monitask.com · 1 monitask.com/pricing pages disagree
Certifications: GDPR compliantEU representativeGDPR compliant with representative in the EU256-bit AES encryption
Customers named: FBA Prep 4U
Not stated on the pages read: Hosting

What Monitask's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: monitask.com, monitask.com/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Monitask's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Monitask, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Monitask by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Monitask is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Monitask, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.