Small business▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 9 → 5 of 50
2 categories · Named, not rankedMentorStack
8Judge labels
3First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. MentorStack was named 3 times in Mentoring software and 1 other category, where Together led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business5 of 54
6%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market23 of 77
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In mentoring software · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named MentorStack for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mentoring software | Learning and development | 0% | 23 of 77 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Together at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Coaching platforms | Learning and development | 0% | 57 of 128 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 20% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, MentorStack held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Mentoring software · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 21 → 29 of 74
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mentoring software | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 23 of 77 |
| Coaching platforms | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 57 of 128, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated MentorStack across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated MentorStack across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labels2
Scale-constrained2 labels1
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“MentorStack Free Pilot up to 10 participants with a basic dashboard, then $12/participant/mo Starter for reporting/export.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Mentoring software · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for Lean Teams & Small Pilots... free pilot program for up to 10 participants” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · alternative
“MentorStack (Best for Tiny Budgets & Program Pilots)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Mentoring software · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as MentorStack, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MentorStack was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as MentorStack, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MentorStack was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MentorStack. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named MentorStack and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
mentorstack.coYour site7
firsthr.app6
mentorcruise.com6
mentorloop.com6
group.app5
mentornity.com5
g2.com4
sourceforge.net4
togetherplatform.com4
capterra.com3
Forty-three of the fifty domain citations in answers naming MentorStack came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on mentorstack.co
117
subdomains included
Content
45
counted in the table below
Documentation
42
Product · Integration
9 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 18 | 0 | 2026-06-23 | ||
| Comparison | 14 | 0 | 2026-06-09 | ||
| Template or tool | 11 | 10 | 2026-08-11 | ||
| Report or ebook | 2 | 2 | 2026-08-12 |
Most recent
- 2026-08-12Complete guide report or ebook
- 2026-08-12Program in a box report or ebook
- 2026-08-11First mentor meeting agenda template or tool
- 2026-08-11Mentee application form template or tool
- 2026-08-11Mentor mentee agreement template or tool
- 2026-08-11Mentor matching questionnaire template or tool
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page mentorstack.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow MentorStack
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
MentorStack is its own company.ShowHide
The company
MentorStack is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Employee mentoring software for lean L&D and Talent teams.
- For
- lean L&D and Talent teams
- Price stated
- Free for up to 10 participants. No credit card, no sales call. SSO (SAML) on Growth and above. mentorstack.co
- Starting price
- 0 mentorstack.co
- Free plan or trial
- Free for up to 10 participants. No credit card, no sales call. mentorstack.co
- Certifications
- PIPEDAGDPR-aware
- Hosting
- CanadaUnited States
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, customers
What MentorStack's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: mentorstack.co, mentorstack.co, mentorstack.co/pricing, mentorstack.co/security, mentorstack.co/features/analytics. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MentorStack's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MentorStack, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for MentorStack by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where MentorStack is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name MentorStack, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.