| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mentoring software | Learning and development | 6% | 5 of 77 | 19% | 42 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Coaching platforms | Learning and development | 0% | 101 of 128 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 20% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mentoring software | 6% | 4% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 5 of 77 |
| Coaching platforms | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 101 of 128, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Enterprise platforms like MentorcliQ and Chronus are best for organizations that need to run, scale, and measure structured mentoring programs internally” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Mentoring software · comparative prompt · first choice
“Chronus is currently one of the most popular platforms for growing companies.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Mentoring software · direct prompt · first choice
“Chronus is currently the gold standard for large-scale corporate programs.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Mentoring software · comparative prompt · first choice
“Chronus is the most commonly cited enterprise pick for mid-market B2B” Muse Glimmer 30B · Mentoring software · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Legacy enterprise tools (like Chronus or MentorcliQ) are often too complex, highly manual to configure, and cost-prohibitive for mid-market budgets.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Mentoring software · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Chronus is strong, but its pricing is quote-based and aimed more at enterprise use, so it's usually not the most budget-friendly starting point.” GPT-5.4 mini · Mentoring software · budget prompt · soft negative
“typically start at $10,000+ per year and require you to go through a lengthy "contact sales" process” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Mentoring software · budget prompt · soft negative
“without the complexity and longer implementation timelines of enterprise-focused solutions like Chronus” Kimi K2 · Mentoring software · direct prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 139 of the 145 answers that named Chronus and are not a share of its labels.
552 of the 627 domain citations in answers naming Chronus came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 302 | 6 | 2026-09-28 | Employee onboarding, Mentoring software | |
| News or press | 81 | 1 | 2026-09-15 | Mentoring software | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 23 | undated | |||
| Case study | 7 | 0 | 2020-01-20 | ||
| Report or ebook | 4 | 0 | 2018-04-13 | ||
| Comparison | 4 | 1 | 2026-07-23 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2026-03-03 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2019-04-23 |
Every page chronus.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Chronus's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: chronus.com, chronus.com/software/security, chronus.com/platform-privacy-policy, chronus.com/why-chronus/case-studies, chronus.com/software/mentoring-software/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Chronus's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Chronus, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Chronus by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: