Small business▼−17Since September 2026: 39% → 22%, −17 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
22%from 39% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 4 pointsRank 1 → 2 of 50
2 categories · RankedPushFar
70Judge labels
16First choices
3Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
19% in Mentoring software for small business buyers
Rank 4 of 77 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 22 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of PushFar →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business2 of 54
19%37 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market4 of 77
9%22 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise26 of 44
0%10 labels
criticized challenger
In mentoring software · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named PushFar for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mentoring software | Learning and development | 9% | 4 of 77 | 0% | 22 | accepted challenger | ▲+1Since September 2026: 10% → 10%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Coaching platforms | Learning and development | 2% | 17 of 128 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 20% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, PushFar held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Mentoring software · by segment
Mid-market▲+1Since September 2026: 10% → 10%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
10%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 12 pointsRank 5 → 4 of 74
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 26 → 31 of 43
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coaching platforms | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 17 of 128, unchanged |
| Mentoring software | 10% | 10% | ▲+1Since September 2026: 10% → 10%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 4 of 77 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated PushFar across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated PushFar across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct11 labels3
Paraphrase9 labels4
Comparative22 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained20 labels8
Scale-constrained4 labels1
Negative4 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative70 labels in all, every segment counted; 16 of the 22 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“PushFar is completely free for individual mentors and mentees... organizational subscriptions start at a highly competitive ~$200 per month” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Free Option: PushFar ... widely recognized as the best free option for internal mentoring programs” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Mentoring software · budget prompt · first choice
“For a limited budget, the strongest recommendation from the results is PushFar.” Perplexity Sonar · Mentoring software · budget prompt · first choice
“would be MentorGain, Together Platform, or PushFar” Llama 4 Maverick · Mentoring software · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PushFar, over the 70 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PushFar was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PushFar, over the 70 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PushFar was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PushFar. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 70 of the 70 answers that named PushFar and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
qooper.io49
growthmentor.com43
chronus.com31
g2.com30
guideflow.com30
mentorcruise.com30
adplist.org27
group.app25
sourceforge.net25
capterra.com24
314 of the 314 domain citations in answers naming PushFar came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
pushfar.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, PushFar takes 9% of first choices and Together takes 28%.ShowHide
Search and answers
pushfar.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, PushFar takes 9% of first choices and Together takes 28%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “mentoring platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “mentoring program software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 90 a month (“pushfar”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 3 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,521 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,112 · 11 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,314
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
9%
rank 4 of 77 in mentoring software
Segment leader
28%
Together
- First choices
- 16 across its categories
- Named in
- 70 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 70 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on pushfar.com
745
subdomains included
Content
558
counted in the table below
Documentation
127
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 530 | 0 | 2026-05-07 | Mentoring software, Employee onboarding | |
| Glossary or explainer | 18 | 0 | 2026-03-13 | ||
| Comparison | 4 | 0 | 2025-11-17 | ||
| Report or ebook | 2 | 0 | 2025-11-17 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 0 | 2025-11-17 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2025-11-17 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2025-11-17 | ||
| News or press | 1 | 0 | 2025-10-31 |
Most recent
- 2026-05-07The role of mentoring in succession planning blog
- 2026-05-07How mentoring helps build more inclusive workplaces blog
- 2026-04-20Online mentoring platforms blog
- 2026-04-20Career and mentoring platform blog
- 2026-03-20The complete guide to choosing the best mentoring platform for your organisation blog
- 2026-03-20A practical guide to running scalable mentoring programmes with technology blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page pushfar.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow PushFar
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
PushFar is its own company.ShowHide
The company
PushFar is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Professional Career Progression & Mentoring Platform
- For
- corporations, educational institutions, and professional organisations
- Certifications
- SSOGDPR compliance
- Customers named
- WaterAidArbuthnot LathamDeloitte Digital, Wave LGBT+ Network
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What PushFar's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: pushfar.com, pushfar.com/features. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PushFar's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PushFar, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PushFar by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where PushFar is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name PushFar, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.