Small business▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 17 → 3 of 71
2 categories · RankedHRSoft
24Judge labels
3First choices
2Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in Pay equity for small business buyers
Rank 27 of 73 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business3 of 78
6%18 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market27 of 73
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise32 of 68
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In pay equity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named HRSoft for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pay equity | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 27 of 73 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Syndio at 12% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 0% | 71 of 93 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 28% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, HRSoft held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Pay equity · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 25 → 26 of 67
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 16 → 42 of 60
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pay equity | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 25 → 27 of 73 |
| Succession planning | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 71 of 93, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated HRSoft across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated HRSoft across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels2
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labels1
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Tailored for SMBs with simple monitoring/budgeting. Quote-based but positioned as affordable” Grok 4.1 Fast · Pay equity · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HRSoft, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HRSoft was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HRSoft, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HRSoft was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HRSoft. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 24 answers that named HRSoft and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
peoplemanagingpeople.com22
skima.ai20
compensationtools.net15
effy.ai15
sourceforge.net12
worldmetrics.org12
guideflow.com11
zipdo.co11
gartner.com8
gitnux.org8
134 of the 134 domain citations in answers naming HRSoft came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
hrsoft.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, HRSoft takes 0% of first choices and Syndio takes 12%.ShowHide
Search and answers
hrsoft.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, HRSoft takes 0% of first choices and Syndio takes 12%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “pay equity tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “pay equity analysis software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 720 a month (“hrsoft”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 5 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,230 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 848 · 21 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,265
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 0 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 27 of 73 in pay equity
Segment leader
12%
Syndio
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 24 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 24 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on hrsoft.com
387
subdomains included
Content
245
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 11
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 221 | 15 | 2026-09-17 | Compensation management, Performance management | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 7 | 1 | 2026-08-13 | ||
| Conference or event | 6 | 0 | 2022-06-09 | ||
| Comparison | 4 | 2 | 2026-08-25 | Compensation management | |
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 0 | 2026-06-04 | Compensation management | |
| Report or ebook | 2 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-17What separates an ai program from an ai policy blog
- 2026-09-01A guide to executive compensation packages blog
- 2026-08-25Total comp vs total rewards comparison
- 2026-08-21From day one hr forum 2026 blog
- 2026-08-21From day one total rewards forum 2026 blog
- 2026-08-21Consero chro forum 2026 blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page hrsoft.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name compensation management (32); 2 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as HRSoft
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as HRSoft; a claim can dispute any of them.
TeamMeter / HRsoft 1
Follow HRSoft
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
HRSoft is its own company.ShowHide
The company
HRSoft is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-Powered Compensation Management Software
- For
- Companies starting their journey in developing a compensation plan outside of spreadsheets with an interest in enterprise-level automation; companies with a strong handle on their compensation processes, operate in multiple countries and require complex automation capabilities; companies with a large global footprint who invest in compensation management as a strategy to retain their employees
- Price stated
- Packages hrsoft.com
- Integrations claimed
- 1 hrsoft.com/pricing
- Customers named
- Walmart CanadaPMA
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, certifications, hosting
What HRSoft's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: hrsoft.com, hrsoft.com/pricing, trust.hrsoft.com, hrsoft.com/case-studies, hrsoft.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HRSoft's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HRSoft, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for HRSoft by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where HRSoft is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name HRSoft, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.