Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 56 → 98 of 100
2 categories · RankedCompport
50Judge labels
5First choices
9Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Compensation management for enterprise buyers
Rank 8 of 140 in the mid-market standing
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 9 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Compport →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business105 of 108
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market8 of 140
4%9 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise7 of 126
4%13 labels
accepted challenger
In compensation management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Compport for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compensation management | Compensation and total rewards | 4% | 8 of 140 | 0% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 1% → 4%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Pay equity | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 23 of 73 | 10% | 10 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Compport held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Compensation management · by segment
Mid-market▲+3Since September 2026: 1% → 4%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 1% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 20 → 8 of 131
Enterprise▲+1Since September 2026: 3% → 4%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 3% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 12 pointsRank 5 of 109, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compensation management | 1% | 4% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 1% → 4%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 20 → 8 of 140 |
| Pay equity | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 23 of 73 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Compport across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Compport across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labels1
Paraphrase8 labels2
Comparative14 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained6 labels2
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative12 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative50 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd recommend evaluating Compport and Comprehensive first since both are specifically positioned for mid-market companies.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Compensation management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you want a single recommendation without more context, I'd pick Compport for most mid-market B2B companies” Perplexity Sonar · Compensation management · direct prompt · first choice
“WorldMetrics ranks Compport as the best pick for HR and comp teams that need repeatable regression pay equity reporting with evidence continuity” Muse Glimmer 30B · Pay equity · comparative prompt · alternative
“Newer, modern platforms that are highly intuitive and have strong traction with tech-forward mid-market companies” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Pay equity · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Compport - Their "pay equity management" is actually salary band design.” Llama 4 Maverick · Pay equity · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Compport, over the 50 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Compport was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Compport, over the 50 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Compport was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Compport. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 50 of the 50 answers that named Compport and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
peoplemanagingpeople.com31
ravio.com28
captivateiq.com26
compport.comYour site26
guideflow.com24
gartner.com22
effy.ai18
learn.g2.com17
worldmetrics.org15
g2.com14
195 of the 221 domain citations in answers naming Compport came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
compport.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Compport takes 4% of first choices and Pave takes 18%.ShowHide
Search and answers
compport.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Compport takes 4% of first choices and Pave takes 18%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “compensation platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “compensation management software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 110 a month (“compport”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,146 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,891 · 31 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,034
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 8 of 140 in compensation management
Segment leader
18%
Pave
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 50 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 50 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on compport.com
591
subdomains included
Content
250
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
13 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 224 | 5 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Comparison | 13 | 5 | 2026-07-29 | ||
| Case study | 7 | 0 | 2025-10-15 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2026-03-03 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Questions to ask an ai compensation vendor before you buy blog
- 2026-09-24Best ai compensation management software blog
- 2026-09-22Compportiq what is it and why should you care blog
- 2026-09-10Enterprise compensation management best practices blog
- 2026-08-14Incentive compensation management software evaluation blog
- 2026-07-29Oracle compensation management alternatives comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page compport.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Compport
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Compport is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Compport is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-native compensation management, powered by compensation intelligence
- For
- enterprises
- Price stated
- Employee-based; Product-Based; Tailored Solutions compport.com/platform/sip-v2
- Certifications
- GDPR Compliance
- Hosting
- Global
- Customers named
- StorableSecurity Bank CorporationExcelerate EnergyRadford Compensation SurveysUniversal Robina CorporationDr. Reddy's LaboratoriesDr. Reddy’sURC
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations
What Compport's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: compport.com, compport.com/platform/sip-v2, compport.com/resources/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Compport's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Compport, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Compport by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Compport is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Compport, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.