AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Hire with Columbus · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Hire with Columbus

9Judge labels
4First choices
0Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
7 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Hire with Columbus was named 7 times in Global payroll, where Deel led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In global payroll · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Hire with Columbus for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Global payroll and employer of recordCore HR and payroll7%6 of 610%7under 10 labels · led by Deel at 30%▼−2Since September 2026: 9% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Hire with Columbus held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Global payroll · by segment

Small business▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 6 → 19 of 48
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 9% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 9% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 7 → 6 of 53

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Global payroll9%6%▼−2Since September 2026: 9% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 7 → 6 of 61

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Hire with Columbus across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash10001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01102
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.510001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B10001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained8 labels4
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Hire with Columbus $179/mo with 193 countries is the most frequently cited lowest-cost option” Muse Glimmer 30B · Global payroll · budget prompt · first choice
“Remofirst or Hire with Columbus offer the best entry-level pricing” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Global payroll · budget prompt · first choice
“RemoFirst or Hire with Columbus offer the best value” MiniMax M2.5 · Global payroll · budget prompt · first choice
“Hire with Columbus (Best Overall Value)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Global payroll · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Hire with Columbus, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Hire with Columbus was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
RemoFirst8 of 93Not among the top eight
Remote7 of 91Not among the top eight
Multiplier7 of 90Not among the top eight
Deel5 of 91Not among the top eight
Remote People3 of 91Not among the top eight
Native Teams2 of 91Not among the top eight
Playroll2 of 90Not among the top eight
Rippling2 of 90Not among the top eight
ADP1 of 90Not among the top eight
Ambacia1 of 90Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Hire with Columbus. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Hire with Columbus and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

remotepeople.com6
employborderless.com5
eoroverview.com4
peoplemanagingpeople.com4
remofirst.com4
teamed.global4
eorcompare.ai3
pin.com3
playroll.com3
remote.com3

Thirty-nine of the thirty-nine domain citations in answers naming Hire with Columbus came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

hirewithcolumbus.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Hire with Columbus takes 7% of first choices and Deel takes 30%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “employer of record”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best employer of record”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
50 a month (“hire with columbus”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
242 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 28 a month
Searches its site ranks for
59 · 1 in the top three
Sites linking to it
142
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
7%
rank 6 of 61 in global payroll
Segment leader
30%
Deel
First choices
4 across its categories
Named in
9 answers
Its own site cited
in 9 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on hirewithcolumbus.com
240
subdomains included
Content
63
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Template or tool36undated
Comparison20undated
Glossary or explainer7undatedGlobal payroll
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page hirewithcolumbus.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Hire with Columbus

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Hire with Columbus; a claim can dispute any of them.
Columbus 1

Follow Hire with Columbus

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Hire with Columbus is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Affordable Employer of Record (EOR) Services
For
Businesses hiring international employees and companies expanding globally
Price stated
Starting from $179/month per employee hirewithcolumbus.com
Starting price
179 hirewithcolumbus.com
Free plan or trial
Your first month is completely free, that's a $179+ value we'll cover personally. hirewithcolumbus.com
Certifications
SOC 2 Type II certifiedISO 27001 certifiedGDPR compliant
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, hosting, customers

What Hire with Columbus's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: hirewithcolumbus.com, hirewithcolumbus.com/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Hire with Columbus's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Hire with Columbus, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Hire with Columbus by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Hire with Columbus is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Hire with Columbus, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at hirewithcolumbus.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.